Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2021-03-11T20:48:15Z
dc.date.available2021-03-11T20:48:15Z
dc.date.created2021-01-25T13:11:01Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationTeatini, Andrea Perez de Frutos, Javier Eigl, Benjamin Aghayan, Davit Pelanis, Egidijus Lai, Marco Kumar, Rahul Prasanna Palomar, Rafael Edwin, Bjørn Elle, Ole Jacob . Influence of sampling accuracy on augmented reality for laparoscopic image-guided surgery. MITAT. Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies. 2020, 1-10
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/83903
dc.description.abstractPurpose This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of point-based registration (PBR) when used for augmented reality (AR) in laparoscopic liver resection surgery. Material and methods The study was conducted in three different scenarios in which the accuracy of sampling targets for PBR decreases: using an assessment phantom with machined divot holes, a patient-specific liver phantom with markers visible in computed tomography (CT) scans and in vivo, relying on the surgeon’s anatomical understanding to perform annotations. Target registration error (TRE) and fiducial registration error (FRE) were computed using five randomly selected positions for image-to-patient registration. Results AR with intra-operative CT scanning showed a mean TRE of 6.9 mm for the machined phantom, 7.9 mm for the patient-specific phantom and 13.4 mm in the in vivo study. Conclusions AR showed an increase in both TRE and FRE throughout the experimental studies, proving that AR is not robust to the sampling accuracy of the targets used to compute image-to-patient registration. Moreover, an influence of the size of the volume to be register was observed. Hence, it is advisable to reduce both errors due to annotations and the size of registration volumes, which can cause large errors in AR systems.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleInfluence of sampling accuracy on augmented reality for laparoscopic image-guided surgery
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorTeatini, Andrea
dc.creator.authorPerez de Frutos, Javier
dc.creator.authorEigl, Benjamin
dc.creator.authorAghayan, Davit
dc.creator.authorPelanis, Egidijus
dc.creator.authorLai, Marco
dc.creator.authorKumar, Rahul Prasanna
dc.creator.authorPalomar, Rafael
dc.creator.authorEdwin, Bjørn
dc.creator.authorElle, Ole Jacob
cristin.unitcode185,15,5,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for informatikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1878411
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=MITAT. Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies&rft.volume=&rft.spage=1&rft.date=2020
dc.identifier.jtitleMITAT. Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.endpage10
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2020.1727524
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-86639
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1364-5706
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/83903/1/Influence%2Bof%2Bsampling%2Baccuracy%2Bon%2Baugmented%2Breality%2Bfor%2Blaparoscopic%2Bimage%2Bguided%2Bsurgery.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/722068


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International