Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2021-01-22T20:46:08Z
dc.date.available2021-01-22T20:46:08Z
dc.date.created2021-01-17T18:57:37Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationBär, Silvio Friedrich . Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo and the Pygmalion Myth Reconsidered. Boletim de Estudos Clássicos. 2020, 65, 83-106
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/82515
dc.description.abstractAlfred Hitchcock’s film Vertigo (1958) has attracted the interest of classical reception scholars because of its adaptation of Ovid’s Pygmalion myth. Scottie, the film’s main character, has been interpreted as a re-enactment of Pygmalion, a character in the Metamorphoses who sculpted his ideal woman out of ivory. In this article, the idea of a direct line of reception from Ovid to Hitchcock is challenged. Rather, the principal model of the film is identified as George Bernard Shaw’s drama Pygmalion (1913). However, Ovid’s Pygmalion story does constitute a model for the film as well, though it does so on a more indirect level. In fact, all the film’s main characters display Ovidian traits. These add an extra layer of meaning to the understanding of the film and the complexity of its characters, and allow for an unexpected re-interpretation of Scottie and his desires.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherUniversidade de Coimbra
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleAlfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo and the Pygmalion Myth Reconsidered
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorBär, Silvio Friedrich
cristin.unitcode185,14,33,30
cristin.unitnameGresk og latin
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1872696
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Boletim de Estudos Clássicos&rft.volume=65&rft.spage=83&rft.date=2020
dc.identifier.jtitleBoletim de Estudos Clássicos
dc.identifier.volume65
dc.identifier.startpage83
dc.identifier.endpage106
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.14195/2183-7260_65_5
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-85381
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0872-2110
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/82515/1/Article_B%25C3%25A4r_2020_Boletim.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International