Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2020-12-14T20:11:05Z
dc.date.available2020-12-14T20:11:05Z
dc.date.created2020-12-11T14:08:22Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationKlootwijk, Anouk Tosca Alve, Elisabeth Hess, Silvia Paul, Renaud Carsten, Sørlie Jane, Dolven . Monitoring environmental impacts of fish farms: Comparing reference conditions of sediment geochemistry and benthic foraminifera with the present. Ecological Indicators. 2020, 120
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/81608
dc.description.abstractIntensive fish farming is a major industry, but the extent of organic matter (OM) and heavy metal pollution by fish farms is debated. This study established in situ reference conditions using geochemical parameters and fossil benthic foraminiferal assemblages in dated sediment cores to identify potential impacts of fish farming in two basins of the inner Øksfjord, Northern Norway. Living (rose Bengal stained) benthic foraminifera were used to assess the present day environmental conditions. The fossil foraminiferal records were compared with the living foraminifera, which in turn were compared with macrofaunal data. Long-term (> 100 yrs) sediment core records of the geochemical parameters (TOC63, C/N, δ13CVPDB TOC and heavy metals) and foraminiferal indices (Norwegian Quality Index (fNQI), AZTI’s Marine Biotic Index (fAMBI), fHlog2, ES100) did not indicate an impact from fish farming through time. Long-term changes in foraminiferal absolute abundances and relative abun- dances of ecological groups (EGs) reflecting organic matter (OM) tolerance suggest that the OM supply slightly increased compared to reference conditions. Relative abundances of Brizalina skagerrakensis and Epistominella vitrea, previously associated with phytodetrital input, suggest a minor increase in primary productivity com- pared to reference conditions. The Stainforthia group (S. fusiformis and S. feylingi), indicative of OM enrichment, in the living foraminiferal assemblages may indicate a response to fish farming activities, but foraminiferal seasonality could not be excluded as a potential cause. The indices of both fossil and living foraminifera, in addition to the macrofauna showed a good to high Ecological Quality Status (EcoQS) through time and at present. This indicates that environmental conditions have been and still are acceptable.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleMonitoring environmental impacts of fish farms: Comparing reference conditions of sediment geochemistry and benthic foraminifera with the present
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorKlootwijk, Anouk Tosca
dc.creator.authorAlve, Elisabeth
dc.creator.authorHess, Silvia
dc.creator.authorPaul, Renaud
dc.creator.authorCarsten, Sørlie
dc.creator.authorJane, Dolven
cristin.unitcode185,15,22,50
cristin.unitnameSeksjon for geologi og geofysikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1858800
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Ecological Indicators&rft.volume=120&rft.spage=&rft.date=2020
dc.identifier.jtitleEcological Indicators
dc.identifier.volume120
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106818
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-84674
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1470-160X
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/81608/2/Klootwijk_etal_2020.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid106818
dc.relation.projectNFR/244572
dc.relation.projectMILJØDIR/MD17SF8F99


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International