Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T19:41:55Z
dc.date.available2020-11-17T19:41:55Z
dc.date.created2020-01-14T14:00:27Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationLundmark, Anders Mattias Augland, Lars Eivind Jørgensen, Simen V . Digital fieldwork with Fieldmove - how do digital tools influence geoscience students’ learning experience in the field?. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 2020, 44(3), 427-440
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/81061
dc.description.abstractThird year geoscience students were introduced to digital tools for fieldwork, Fieldmove on iPads, in a capstone field mapping course at Oslo University, Norway. Despite little prior experience with digital tools for fieldwork, they became independent Fieldmove users in a few hours. They self-report positive cognitive impacts, including positive effects on quality of fieldwork, maps and reports. However, submitted course material suggest students achieved similar levels of understanding with and without digital tools. We hypothesize that students’ confidence in their work increases when supported by digital tools, however, they may also overrate their proficiency due to the ease of collecting large data sets, and the professional look of the digital outputs. Students report both positive and negative effects on teamwork; observations suggest this reflects sharing of devices rather than use of digital tools per se. The students also report pronounced positive affective impacts, which appear to be the main effect of the digital tools in this study. Overall, the students are very positive to digital tools in fieldwork, preferring they were introduced early during the bachelor program, but after traditional field methods are learnt. When given a choice, most students chose to combine traditional and digital tools for their fieldwork.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleDigital fieldwork with Fieldmove - how do digital tools influence geoscience students’ learning experience in the field?
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorLundmark, Anders Mattias
dc.creator.authorAugland, Lars Eivind
dc.creator.authorJørgensen, Simen V
cristin.unitcode185,15,22,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for geofag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1772461
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal of Geography in Higher Education&rft.volume=44&rft.spage=427&rft.date=2020
dc.identifier.jtitleJournal of Geography in Higher Education
dc.identifier.volume44
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage427
dc.identifier.endpage440
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2020.1712685
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-84155
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0309-8265
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/81061/2/lundmark.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International