Hide metadata

Discordant Interpretations of the Right to a Fair Trial before the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union: The necessity to guarantee consistency in the interpretation of the procedural right to adversarial proceedings of the right to a Fair Trial in a context of Constitutional Pluralism

dc.contributor.authorIrti, Giorgia
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-07T23:46:10Z
dc.date.available2020-09-07T23:46:10Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationIrti, Giorgia. Discordant Interpretations of the Right to a Fair Trial before the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union: The necessity to guarantee consistency in the interpretation of the procedural right to adversarial proceedings of the right to a Fair Trial in a context of Constitutional Pluralism. Master thesis, University of Oslo, 2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/79194
dc.description.abstracteng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subject
dc.titleDiscordant Interpretations of the Right to a Fair Trial before the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union: The necessity to guarantee consistency in the interpretation of the procedural right to adversarial proceedings of the right to a Fair Trial in a context of Constitutional Pluralismeng
dc.typeMaster thesis
dc.date.updated2020-09-07T23:46:10Z
dc.creator.authorIrti, Giorgia
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-82315
dc.type.documentMasteroppgave
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/79194/1/8008_-HUMR5200_thesis_uio.pdf


Files in this item

Name:
8008_-HUMR5200_thesis_uio.pdf
Size:
625.5Kb
Format:
application/
View/Open

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata