Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2020-09-01T18:15:02Z
dc.date.available2020-09-01T18:15:02Z
dc.date.created2020-08-26T10:42:43Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationSkonnord, Trygve T. Skjeie, Holgeir Brekke, Mette Klovning, Atle Grotle, Margreth Aas, Eline Mdala, Ibrahimu Fetveit, Arne . Acupuncture for acute non-specific low back pain: a randomised, controlled, multicentre intervention study in general practice—the Acuback study. BMJ Open. 2020, 10(8)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/79103
dc.description.abstractObjectives The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a single treatment session of acupuncture, when applied in addition to standard treatment for acute low back pain (ALBP), reduces the time to recovery compared with standard treatment alone. Design A multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Setting Conducted at 11 Norwegian general practitioners’ (GPs’) offices. Participants 171 adults aged 20–55 years seeking their GP for ALBP (≤14 days) between March 2014 and March 2017. Patients with secondary back pain and previous sick leave and acupuncture treatment was excluded. Interventions The participants were randomised to either the control group (CG) or the acupuncture group (AG) by online software. The CG received standard treatment according to the Norwegian guidelines, while the AG received one session of Western medical acupuncture treatment in addition to standard treatment. The statistician was blinded to group status. Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcome was median days to recovery. Secondary outcomes were pain intensity, global improvement, back-specific functional status, sick leave, medication and adverse effects. Results 185 participants were randomised, 95 in the CG and 90 in the AG. 14 participants did not receive the allocated intervention and 4 were excluded from the analysis. Thus, 167 participants were included in the analysis, 86 in the CG and 81 in the AG. The groups were similar according to baseline characteristics. The median time to recovery was 14 days for the CG and 9 days for the AG, HR 1.37 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.96), (p=0.089). No serious adverse effects were reported. Conclusions We did not find any statistically significant reduction in time-to-recovery after a single session of acupuncture for ALBP compared with standard care.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.titleAcupuncture for acute non-specific low back pain: a randomised, controlled, multicentre intervention study in general practice—the Acuback study
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorSkonnord, Trygve T.
dc.creator.authorSkjeie, Holgeir
dc.creator.authorBrekke, Mette
dc.creator.authorKlovning, Atle
dc.creator.authorGrotle, Margreth
dc.creator.authorAas, Eline
dc.creator.authorMdala, Ibrahimu
dc.creator.authorFetveit, Arne
cristin.unitcode185,52,15,0
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for allmennmedisin
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1825216
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=BMJ Open&rft.volume=10&rft.spage=&rft.date=2020
dc.identifier.jtitleBMJ Open
dc.identifier.volume10
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.pagecount9
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034157
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-82211
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/79103/1/Skonnord%2BBMJ%2BOpen%2B2020%2BAcuback.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleide034157


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International