Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2020-08-06T17:54:49Z
dc.date.available2020-08-06T17:54:49Z
dc.date.created2019-09-25T13:17:05Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationPsilander, Niklas Eftestøl, Einar Cumming, Kristoffer Toldnes Solgård, Inga Juvkam Ekblom, Maria M. Sunding, Kerstin Wernbom, Mathias Holmberg, Hans-Christer Ekblom, Björn Bruusgaard, Jo C. Raastad, Truls Gundersen, Kristian . Effects of training, detraining, and retraining on strength, hypertrophy, and myonuclear number in human skeletal muscle. Journal of applied physiology. 2019, 126(6), 1636-1645
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/78161
dc.description.abstractPreviously trained mouse muscles acquire strength and volume faster than naïve muscles; it has been suggested that this is related to increased myonuclear density. The present study aimed to determine whether a previously strength-trained leg (mem-leg) would respond better to a period of strength training than a previously untrained leg (con-leg). Nine men and 10 women performed unilateral strength training (T1) for 10 wk, followed by 20 wk of detraining (DT) and a 5-wk bilateral retraining period (T2). Muscle biopsies were taken before and after each training period and analyzed for myonuclear number, fiber volume, and cross-sectional area (CSA). Ultrasound and one repetition of maximum leg extension were performed to determine muscle thickness (MT) and strength. CSA (~17%), MT (~10%), and strength (~20%) increased during T1 in the mem-leg. However, the myonuclear number and fiber volume did not change. MT and CSA returned to baseline values during DT, but strength remained elevated (~60%), supporting previous findings of a long-lasting motor learning effect. MT and strength increased similarly in the mem-leg and con-leg during T2, whereas CSA, fiber volume, and myonuclear number remained unaffected. In conclusion, training response during T2 did not differ between the mem-leg and con-leg. However, this does not discount the existence of human muscle memory, since no increase in the number of myonuclei was detected during T1 and no clear detraining effect was observed for cell size during DT; thus, the present data did not allow for a rigorous test of the muscle memory hypothesis.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherAmerican Physiological Society
dc.titleEffects of training, detraining, and retraining on strength, hypertrophy, and myonuclear number in human skeletal muscle
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorPsilander, Niklas
dc.creator.authorEftestøl, Einar
dc.creator.authorCumming, Kristoffer Toldnes
dc.creator.authorSolgård, Inga Juvkam
dc.creator.authorEkblom, Maria M.
dc.creator.authorSunding, Kerstin
dc.creator.authorWernbom, Mathias
dc.creator.authorHolmberg, Hans-Christer
dc.creator.authorEkblom, Björn
dc.creator.authorBruusgaard, Jo C.
dc.creator.authorRaastad, Truls
dc.creator.authorGundersen, Kristian
cristin.unitcode185,15,29,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for biovitenskap
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1728886
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal of applied physiology&rft.volume=126&rft.spage=1636&rft.date=2019
dc.identifier.jtitleJournal of applied physiology
dc.identifier.volume126
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.startpage1636
dc.identifier.endpage1645
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00917.2018
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-81278
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn8750-7587
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/78161/1/Cumming%2BJApplPhys%2B2019.pdf
dc.type.versionAcceptedVersion
dc.relation.projectNFR/240374


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata