Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2020-07-02T18:16:55Z
dc.date.available2020-07-02T18:16:55Z
dc.date.created2020-02-03T15:35:59Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationHaider, Shamim Saeed, Muhammad Lindbråthen, Arne Hagg, May-Britt . Techno-economic evaluation of helium recovery from natural gas; A comparison between inorganic and polymeric membrane technology. Journal of Membrane Science and Research (JMCR). 2019, 5(2), 126-136
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/77399
dc.description.abstractNatural gas produced at high pressure (50-70 bar) is the only industrial source of helium (He). A membrane separation process may offer a more efficient production system with smaller footprint and lower operational cost than conventional cryogenic system. Inorganic membranes with high mechanical strength are known to exhibit good stability at high pressure. In this work, two inorganic membranes, porous silica and carbon molecular sieve (CMS) were studied by simulation for their applicability in the He recovery process and compared against a Matrimid polymeric membrane. An in-house developed membrane simulation model (Chembrane) interfaced with Aspen HYSYS was used to simulate the membrane area and energy requirement for the He separation process. He was separated directly from a mixture containing methane (CH4) and 1-5 mole% He in the feed stream, and natural gas containing 1-5 mole% of He in a mixture of CH4 and N2. These streams were considered at 70 bar pressure and 25 °C. Single and two-stage membrane separation processes with and without recycle stream were simulated to achieve 97 mole % purity and 90% recovery of He. The simulation results showed that all three membranes can achieve required purity and recovery in a two-stage separation process. However, a recycle is required while using Matrimid membrane which adds cost and complexity to the system. The highest net present value (NPV) for silica, CMS, and Matrimid membrane was $M 2.5, 2, and 1.75 respectively when 5% He is present in feed gas and 15 years of plant life is considered.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherMembrane Processes Research Laboratory (MPRL)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleTechno-economic evaluation of helium recovery from natural gas; A comparison between inorganic and polymeric membrane technology
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorHaider, Shamim
dc.creator.authorSaeed, Muhammad
dc.creator.authorLindbråthen, Arne
dc.creator.authorHagg, May-Britt
cristin.unitcode185,16,15,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for oral biologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1790372
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal of Membrane Science and Research (JMCR)&rft.volume=5&rft.spage=126&rft.date=2019
dc.identifier.jtitleJournal of Membrane Science and Research (JMCR)
dc.identifier.volume5
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage126
dc.identifier.endpage136
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.22079/JMSR.2018.87998.1196
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-80537
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/77399/2/Techno-Economic%2BEvaluation%2Bof%2BHelium%2BRecovery%2Bfrom%2BNatural%2BGas%253B%2BA%2BComparison%2BBetween.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International