Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2020-07-02T18:08:32Z
dc.date.available2020-07-02T18:08:32Z
dc.date.created2019-08-26T10:05:17Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationYang, Liu van den Wildenberg, Wery P. M. de Graaf, Ysanne Ames, Susan L. Baldacchino, Alexander Bø, Ragnhild Cadaveira, Fernando Campanella, Salvatore Christiansen, Paul Claus, Eric D. Colzato, Lorenza S. Filbey, Francesca M. Foxe, John J. Garavan, Hugh Hendershot, Christian S. Hester, Robert Jester, Jennifer M. Karoly, Hollis C. Kräplin, Anja Kreusch, Fanny Landro, Nils Inge Littel, Marianne Loeber, Sabine London, Edythe D. López-Caneda, Eduardo Lubman, Dan I. Luijten, Maartje Marczinski, Cecile A. Metrik, Jane Montgomery, Catharine Papachristou, Harilaos Park, Su Mi Paz, Andres L. Petit, Géraldine Prisciandaro, James J. Quednow, Boris B. Ray, Lara A. Roberts, Carl A. Roberts, Gloria M. P. deRuiter, Michiel B. Rupp, Claudia I. Steele, Vaughn R. Sun, Delin Takagi, Michael Tapert, Susan F. van Holst, Ruth J. Verdejo-Garcia, Antonio Vonmoos, Matthias Wojnar, Marcin Yao, Yuanwei Yücel, Murat Zack, Martin Zucker, Robert A. Huizenga, Hilde M. Wiers, Reinout W. . Is (poly-) substance use associated with impaired inhibitory control? A mega-analysis controlling for confounders. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2019, 105, 288-304
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/77397
dc.description.abstractMany studies have reported that heavy substance use is associated with impaired response inhibition. Studies typically focused on associations with a single substance, while polysubstance use is common. Further, most studies compared heavy users with light/non-users, though substance use occurs along a continuum. The current mega-analysis accounted for these issues by aggregating individual data from 43 studies (3610 adult participants) that used the Go/No-Go (GNG) or Stop-signal task (SST) to assess inhibition among mostly “recreational” substance users (i.e., the rate of substance use disorders was low). Main and interaction effects of substance use, demographics, and task-characteristics were entered in a linear mixed model. Contrary to many studies and reviews in the field, we found that only lifetime cannabis use was associated with impaired response inhibition in the SST. An interaction effect was also observed: the relationship between tobacco use and response inhibition (in the SST) differed between cannabis users and non-users, with a negative association between tobacco use and inhibition in the cannabis non-users. In addition, participants’ age, education level, and some task characteristics influenced inhibition outcomes. Overall, we found limited support for impaired inhibition among substance users when controlling for demographics and task-characteristics.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleIs (poly-) substance use associated with impaired inhibitory control? A mega-analysis controlling for confounders
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorYang, Liu
dc.creator.authorvan den Wildenberg, Wery P. M.
dc.creator.authorde Graaf, Ysanne
dc.creator.authorAmes, Susan L.
dc.creator.authorBaldacchino, Alexander
dc.creator.authorBø, Ragnhild
dc.creator.authorCadaveira, Fernando
dc.creator.authorCampanella, Salvatore
dc.creator.authorChristiansen, Paul
dc.creator.authorClaus, Eric D.
dc.creator.authorColzato, Lorenza S.
dc.creator.authorFilbey, Francesca M.
dc.creator.authorFoxe, John J.
dc.creator.authorGaravan, Hugh
dc.creator.authorHendershot, Christian S.
dc.creator.authorHester, Robert
dc.creator.authorJester, Jennifer M.
dc.creator.authorKaroly, Hollis C.
dc.creator.authorKräplin, Anja
dc.creator.authorKreusch, Fanny
dc.creator.authorLandro, Nils Inge
dc.creator.authorLittel, Marianne
dc.creator.authorLoeber, Sabine
dc.creator.authorLondon, Edythe D.
dc.creator.authorLópez-Caneda, Eduardo
dc.creator.authorLubman, Dan I.
dc.creator.authorLuijten, Maartje
dc.creator.authorMarczinski, Cecile A.
dc.creator.authorMetrik, Jane
dc.creator.authorMontgomery, Catharine
dc.creator.authorPapachristou, Harilaos
dc.creator.authorPark, Su Mi
dc.creator.authorPaz, Andres L.
dc.creator.authorPetit, Géraldine
dc.creator.authorPrisciandaro, James J.
dc.creator.authorQuednow, Boris B.
dc.creator.authorRay, Lara A.
dc.creator.authorRoberts, Carl A.
dc.creator.authorRoberts, Gloria M. P.
dc.creator.authordeRuiter, Michiel B.
dc.creator.authorRupp, Claudia I.
dc.creator.authorSteele, Vaughn R.
dc.creator.authorSun, Delin
dc.creator.authorTakagi, Michael
dc.creator.authorTapert, Susan F.
dc.creator.authorvan Holst, Ruth J.
dc.creator.authorVerdejo-Garcia, Antonio
dc.creator.authorVonmoos, Matthias
dc.creator.authorWojnar, Marcin
dc.creator.authorYao, Yuanwei
dc.creator.authorYücel, Murat
dc.creator.authorZack, Martin
dc.creator.authorZucker, Robert A.
dc.creator.authorHuizenga, Hilde M.
dc.creator.authorWiers, Reinout W.
cristin.unitcode185,17,5,0
cristin.unitnamePsykologisk institutt
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.cristin1718581
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews&rft.volume=105&rft.spage=288&rft.date=2019
dc.identifier.jtitleNeuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
dc.identifier.volume105
dc.identifier.startpage288
dc.identifier.endpage304
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.07.006
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-80535
dc.subject.nviVDP::Psykologi: 260
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0149-7634
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/77397/4/1-s2.0-S014976341830633X-main.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International