Perceived and experienced stigma in first-episode psychosis: A 1-year follow-up study

Abstract

Objectives

Perceived/experienced stigma and its relationship with clinical outcome were investigated across the first year of treatment in a large sample with first-episode psychosis (FEP). Methods

FEP participants (n = 112) in the TOP study were investigated at baseline and 1-year follow-up. Perceived/experienced stigma was measured with items from the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), assessing problems because of barriers and hindrances, and living with dignity because of attitudes and actions of others. Clinical outcome included: symptoms, global functioning, self-rated disability and self-rated life satisfaction. Results

In the total sample, 46% perceived/experienced stigma at baseline, which decreased significantly to 32% at 1-year follow-up. Perceived/experienced stigma was present in 1/5 at both time-points (Sustained stigma), in 2/5 at only one time-point (Transient stigma), and in 2/5 it was not present at either time-point (No stigma). Compared to the No stigma group, the Sustained stigma group had significantly higher levels of positive, excited and depressive symptoms and self-rated disability, as well as lower levels of global functioning and life satisfaction at 1 year follow-up, while the Transient stigma group only had poorer functioning and higher self-rated disability. Yet the outcome variables improved across the first year of treatment in all three stigma groups. Conclusion

Perceived/experienced stigma was common in FEP, yet the rate decreased across the first year of treatment. Although there was some clinical improvement across the first year of treatment irrespective of stigma, stigma was related to poorer clinical outcome in a bidirectional manner. This suggests that perceived/experienced stigma is an important target in the early stages of treatment.