dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-30T18:25:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-05-30T18:25:13Z | |
dc.date.created | 2020-01-31T09:15:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Bach, Tobias Verhoest, Koen Wynen, Jan . The interaction of administrative tradition and organisational characteristics: the case of agency personnel management autonomy. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2020 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10852/76512 | |
dc.description.abstract | Comparative scholars emphasise that public administration should be understood in terms of context-bound patterns of organising and decision-making. Agencies in the same context will display more commonalities than those in another. At the same time, there is good empirical evidence for organisational-level variation in decision-making. For instance, not all agencies in one country are delegated similar levels of personnel management autonomy. This article develops a theoretical argument about how administrative tradition moderates the effect of organisational drivers of personnel management autonomy. We identify the degree of uniformity embedded in administrative tradition as a key explanatory factor for this relationship. In empirical terms, the article compares the perceived personnel management autonomy of agencies in 10 European countries nested in three country clusters (Scandinavian, Latin-Napoleonic and Continental). The analysis confirms theoretical expectations about the context-specific effects of organisational characteristics on personnel management autonomy in agencies. | |
dc.language | EN | |
dc.title | The interaction of administrative tradition and organisational characteristics: the case of agency personnel management autonomy | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dc.creator.author | Bach, Tobias | |
dc.creator.author | Verhoest, Koen | |
dc.creator.author | Wynen, Jan | |
cristin.unitcode | 185,17,8,0 | |
cristin.unitname | Institutt for statsvitenskap | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | postprint | |
cristin.qualitycode | 2 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1787497 | |
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitation | info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=International Review of Administrative Sciences&rft.volume=&rft.spage=&rft.date=2020 | |
dc.identifier.jtitle | International Review of Administrative Sciences | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0020852319889674 | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:no-79627 | |
dc.type.document | Tidsskriftartikkel | |
dc.type.peerreviewed | Peer reviewed | |
dc.source.issn | 0020-8523 | |
dc.identifier.fulltext | Fulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/76512/2/Bach_Verhoest_Wynen_IRAS_Post-Print.pdf | |
dc.type.version | AcceptedVersion | |
cristin.articleid | 002085231988967 | |