Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2020-05-28T18:12:51Z
dc.date.available2020-05-28T18:12:51Z
dc.date.created2020-01-13T10:42:22Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationJackson, Catherine Ernø, Inger Thea Myklebust Ringstad, Håkon Tønseth, Kim Alexander Dartt, Darlene Ann Utheim, Tor Paaske . Simple limbal epithelial transplantation: Current status and future perspectives: Concise review. Stem Cells Translational Medicine. 2019, 1-13
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/76379
dc.description.abstractDamage to limbal stem cells as a result of injury or disease can lead to limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). This disease is characterized by decreased vision that is often painful and may progress to blindness. Clinical features include inflammation, neovascularization, and persistent cornea epithelial defects. Successful strategies for treatment involve transplantation of grafts harvested from the limbus of the alternate healthy eye, called conjunctival‐limbal autograft (CLAU) and transplantation of limbal cell sheets cultured from limbal biopsies, termed cultured limbal epithelial transplantation (CLET). In 2012, Sangwan and colleagues presented simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET), a novel transplantation technique that combines the benefits of CLAU and CLET and avoids the challenges associated with both. In SLET a small biopsy from the limbus of the healthy eye is divided and distributed over human amniotic membrane, which is placed on the affected cornea. Outgrowth occurs from each small explant and a complete corneal epithelium is typically formed within 2 weeks. Advantages of SLET include reduced risk of iatrogenic LSCD occurring in the healthy cornea at harvest; direct transfer circumventing the need for cell culture; and the opportunity to perform biopsy harvest and transplantation in one operation. Success so far using SLET is comparable with CLAU and CLET. Of note, 336 of 404 (83%) operations using SLET resulted in restoration of the corneal epithelium, whereas visual acuity improved in 258 of the 373 (69%) reported cases. This review summarizes the results of 31 studies published on SLET since 2012. Progress, advantages, challenges, and suggestions for future studies are presented.en_US
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherAlphaMed Press
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.titleSimple limbal epithelial transplantation: Current status and future perspectives: Concise reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.creator.authorJackson, Catherine
dc.creator.authorErnø, Inger Thea Myklebust
dc.creator.authorRingstad, Håkon
dc.creator.authorTønseth, Kim Alexander
dc.creator.authorDartt, Darlene Ann
dc.creator.authorUtheim, Tor Paaske
cristin.unitcode185,16,15,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for oral biologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1771177
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Stem Cells Translational Medicine&rft.volume=&rft.spage=1&rft.date=2019
dc.identifier.jtitleStem Cells Translational Medicine
dc.identifier.volume9
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage316
dc.identifier.endpage327
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/sctm.19-0203
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-79490
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2157-6564
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/76379/1/Simple%2Blimbal%2Bepithelial%2Btransplantation_%2BCurrent%2Bstatus%2Band%2Bfuture%2Bperspectives_%2BConcise%2Breview.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International