Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2020-05-07T18:05:17Z
dc.date.available2020-05-07T18:05:17Z
dc.date.created2020-01-06T12:24:22Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJelin, Elma Wisløff, Torbjørn Jørstad, Øystein Kalsnes Heiberg, Turid Moe, Morten Carsten . Patient-reported outcome measures in the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a 1-year prospective study. BMJ Open Ophthalmology. 2019, 4(1), 1-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/75204
dc.description.abstractTo prospectively explore the following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD): (1) self-reported visual function, (2) symptom-state, (3) general-health and (4) satisfaction of treatment.Methods and analysisCorresponding to the four PROMs, participants responded to the following questionnaires: (1) National Eye Institute Visual-Functioning-Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25), (2) Patient-Acceptable-Symptom-Status (PASS 5), (3) EuroQol-Group-Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) and (4) Dimensions of Importance in Treatment of nAMD (DITAMD). Data were collected at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor treatment. Results were evaluated with t-tests and mixed linear regression analyses.The study included 197 patients. At baseline NEI-VFQ-25 (79.53±14.52) and EQ-5D (0.74±0.28) had relatively high scores, whereas PASS 5 was below ‘acceptable’ (3.30±0.80). At 12 months NEI-VFQ-25 and PASS 5 showed significant improvement, whereas EQ-5D and DITAMD remained unchanged. At baseline patients receiving treatment of the better-seeing eye (BSE) (n=52) reported significantly worse NEI-VFQ-25 and PASS 5 than patients for whom treatment only involved the worse-seeing eye (WSE), (n=145). In contrast to BSE patients, there was no improvement of NEI-VFQ-25 for WSE patients at 12 months, despite a significant improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Two independent variables, treatment including the BSE and BCVA for the treated eye, were found to predict both NEI-VFQ-25 and PASS 5.After 12 months of nAMD treatment, there was a significant improvement in PASS 5 and NEI-VFQ-25, the latter depending on whether therapy included BSE. EQ-5D and DITAMD remained unaltered.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherBMJ
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.titlePatient-reported outcome measures in the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a 1-year prospective study
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorJelin, Elma
dc.creator.authorWisløff, Torbjørn
dc.creator.authorJørstad, Øystein Kalsnes
dc.creator.authorHeiberg, Turid
dc.creator.authorMoe, Morten Carsten
cristin.unitcode185,53,43,11
cristin.unitnameØyeavdelingen
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1766777
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=BMJ Open Ophthalmology&rft.volume=4&rft.spage=1&rft.date=2019
dc.identifier.jtitleBMJ Open Ophthalmology
dc.identifier.volume4
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000353
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-78341
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2397-3269
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/75204/2/Patient-reported%2Boutcome%2Bmeasures%2Bin%2Bthe%2Bmanagement%2Bof%2Bneovascular.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleide000353


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International