Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2020-05-04T18:53:43Z
dc.date.available2020-05-04T18:53:43Z
dc.date.created2019-12-18T11:37:44Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationGundersen, Ingar Mørkestøl . The Fimbulwinter theory and the 6th century crisis in the light of Norwegian archaeology: Towards a human-environmental approach. Primitive tider. 2019, 21, 101-119
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/75092
dc.description.abstractIn this article, I have tried to discuss the Fimbulwinter theory in a research historical perspective, in order to disentangle the premises presented by both advocates and critics alike. By and large, the current debate follows the contours of previous discourses on the 6th century transition, at the risk of entrenching the arguments within two defined and established perspectives: material change as a reflection of crisis, and, secondly, material change as an expression of cultural innovation. Neither of these perspectives is satisfactory, as they both run the risk of downplaying either, in the first case, long-term socio-cultural dynamics or, in the second case, environmental factors. In other words, an environmental perspective is inadequate as an analytical framework, since it is liable to provide simplified and deterministic interpretations of past societal change. The roots of environmental disasters must be studied from a social perspective, in which societal preconditions for vulnerability to hazards are analysed. Consequently, an integrated human-environmental approach must be developed, which takes into consideration the importance of both human and natural systems, and the interaction between them. There is, indeed, no contradiction between the two interpretative frameworks of crisis and a change of practice, as both perspectives are required for an in-depth understanding of the spatial and temporal complexity associated with the transition from the Early to the Late Iron Age. Considerable scientific potential might be obtained by employing a human-environmental approach, in which the 6th century transition is analysed at the interface of human and environmental systems, rather than within an explicit social or climatic interpretative framework.
dc.description.abstractThe Fimbulwinter theory and the 6th century crisis in the light of Norwegian archaeology: Towards a human-environmental approach
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherPrimitive tider
dc.rightsNavngivelse-IkkeKommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no
dc.titleThe Fimbulwinter theory and the 6th century crisis in the light of Norwegian archaeology: Towards a human-environmental approach
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorGundersen, Ingar Mørkestøl
cristin.unitcode185,27,82,0
cristin.unitnameArkeologisk seksjon
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1762419
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Primitive tider&rft.volume=21&rft.spage=101&rft.date=2019
dc.identifier.jtitlePrimitive tider
dc.identifier.volume21
dc.identifier.startpage101
dc.identifier.endpage119
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-78207
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1501-0430
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/75092/1/Gundersen_2019_PrimitiveTider.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
dc.relation.projectNFR/275191


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata