Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2020-05-03T18:06:40Z
dc.date.available2020-05-03T18:06:40Z
dc.date.created2019-06-18T12:32:25Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationLeiren, Merethe Dotterud Szulecki, Kacper Rayner, Tim Banet, Catherine . Energy security concerns versus market harmony: The Europeanisation of capacity mechanisms. Politics and Governance. 2019, 7(1), 92-104
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/75037
dc.description.abstractThe impact of renewables on the energy markets–falling wholesale electricity prices and lower investment stability–are apparently creating a shortage of energy project financing, which in future could lead to power supply shortages. Governments have responded by introducing payments for capacity, alongside payments for energy being sold. The increasing use of capacity mechanisms (CMs) in the EU has created tensions between the European Commission, which encourages cross-country cooperation, and Member States that favour backup solutions such as capacity markets and strategic reserves. We seek to trace the influence of the European Commission on national capacity markets as well as learning between Member States. Focusing on the United Kingdom, France and Poland, the analysis shows that energy security concerns have been given more emphasis than the functioning of markets by Member States. Policy developments have primarily been domestically driven, but the European Commission has managed to impose certain elements, most importantly a uniform methodology to assess future supply security, as well as specific requirements for national capacity markets: interconnectors to neighbouring countries, demand side responses and continuous revision of CMs. Learning from other Member States’ experiences also play a role in policy decisions.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherCogitatio
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleEnergy security concerns versus market harmony: The Europeanisation of capacity mechanisms
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorLeiren, Merethe Dotterud
dc.creator.authorSzulecki, Kacper
dc.creator.authorRayner, Tim
dc.creator.authorBanet, Catherine
cristin.unitcode185,17,8,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for statsvitenskap
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1705660
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Politics and Governance&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=92&rft.date=2019
dc.identifier.jtitlePolitics and Governance
dc.identifier.volume7
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i1.1791
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-78162
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2183-2463
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/75037/1/PaG%2B7%25281%2529%2B-%2BEnergy%2BSecurity%2BConcerns%2Bversus%2BMarket%2BHarmony_%2BThe%2BEuropeanisation%2Bof%2BCapacity%2BMechanisms.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid92


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International