Now showing items 21-25 of 25

  • Føllesdal, Andreas (Journal article / Tidsskriftartikkel / PublishedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2020)
    States are free, yet everywhere live under international courts and tribunals (ICs). As they proliferate and gain power across ever more domains, ICs become targets of resistance and criticism that they are illegitimate ...
  • Føllesdal, Andreas (Chapter / Bokkapittel / PublishedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2022)
    Sovereign States are under a legal obligation to comply with customary international law even though they have not explicitly consented to these norms. How should international courts accommodate both such non-consent-based ...
  • Føllesdal, Andreas (Chapter / Bokkapittel / AcceptedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2017)
    This material has been published in Moral and Political Conceptions of Human Rights: Implications for Theory and Practice edited by Reidar Maliks and Johan Karlsson Schaffer. This version is free to view and download for ...
  • Føllesdal, Andreas (Journal article / Tidsskriftartikkel / PublishedVersion, 2014)
  • Føllesdal, Andreas (Journal article / Tidsskriftartikkel / AcceptedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2017)
    Is international judicial human rights review anti-democratic and therefore illegitimate, and objectionably epistocratic to boot? Or is such review compatible with—and even a recommended component of—an epistemic account ...