Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2020-04-22T19:18:18Z
dc.date.available2020-04-22T19:18:18Z
dc.date.created2016-09-05T10:46:25Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationKoren Solvang, Per Hanisch, Halvor Melbye Reinhardt, Jan D. . The rehabilitation research matrix: producing knowledge at micro, meso, and macro levels. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2017, 39(19), 1983-1989
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/74764
dc.description.abstractPurpose: EU policy documents and health scholars point out that in order to understand the complexity of modern health systems, as well as to devise appropriate policy responses, considering micro, meso, and macro levels is indispensable. This article aims to develop an analytical framework for how rehabilitation as an interdisciplinary field can be framed in such a three-level framework. Methods: This is a conceptual paper based on recent contributions to the development of a theory of rehabilitation. The paper applies sociological theory to build an analytical framework for a holistic understanding of rehabilitation. Results: Three groups of agents in the field of rehabilitation are identified: individuals with disabilities, professionals, and governmental authorities. The paper systematizes how these agents are positioned and act at micro, meso, and macro levels. In the intersection between the three levels of society and the three groups of actors, a nine-cell table emerges. In the cells of the table, key examples of important social processes to study in the field of disability and rehabilitation are identified. At the micro level, individuals experience a daily life relevant to rehabilitation, professionals ask what works in therapy, and policy authorities promote a strong work ethic. At the meso level, individuals with disabilities act as service user groups, professionals develop organizational designs and the policy authorities ask for cost-effective services. At the macro level, organizations representing people with disabilities lobby, professionals negotiate authorization issues, and the policymaking authorities must identify what can count as just distribution of services. The nine cells of the table are elaborated on by presenting relevant current studies exemplifying each cell. Conclusion: To systematize societal levels and agents involved is to enhance the understanding of rehabilitation as an interdisciplinary field of research.
dc.languageEN
dc.titleThe rehabilitation research matrix: producing knowledge at micro, meso, and macro levels
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorKoren Solvang, Per
dc.creator.authorHanisch, Halvor Melbye
dc.creator.authorReinhardt, Jan D.
cristin.unitcode185,52,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for helse og samfunn
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1378059
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Disability and Rehabilitation&rft.volume=39&rft.spage=1983&rft.date=2017
dc.identifier.jtitleDisability and Rehabilitation
dc.identifier.volume39
dc.identifier.issue19
dc.identifier.startpage1983
dc.identifier.endpage1989
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1212115
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-77849
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.source.issn0963-8288
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/74764/3/The%2BRehabilitation%2BResearch%2BMatrix.pdf
dc.type.versionSubmittedVersion
dc.relation.projectNFR/209748


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata