Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2020-04-14T18:04:54Z
dc.date.available2020-04-14T18:04:54Z
dc.date.created2019-06-07T14:58:20Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationUtheim, Øygunn Aass Pasovic, Lara Ræder, Sten Eidet, Jon Roger Fostad, Ida Sehic, Amer Roald, Borghild de la Paz, Maria Fideliz Lyberg, Torstein Dartt, Darlene A. Utheim, Tor Paaske . Effects of explant size on epithelial outgrowth, thickness, stratification, ultrastructure and phenotype of cultured limbal epithelial cells. PLOS ONE. 2019, 14(3)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/74507
dc.description.abstractPurpose Transplantation of limbal stem cells is a promising therapy for limbal stem cell deficiency. Limbal cells can be harvested from either a healthy part of the patient’s eye or the eye of a donor. Small explants are less likely to inflict injury to the donor site. We investigated the effects of limbal explant size on multiple characteristics known to be important for transplant function. Methods Human limbal epithelial cells were expanded from large versus small explants (3 versus 1 mm of the corneal circumference) for 3 weeks and characterized by light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy. Epithelial thickness, stratification, outgrowth, ultrastructure and phenotype were assessed. Results Epithelial thickness and stratification were similar between the groups. Outgrowth size correlated positively with explant size (r = 0.37; P = 0.01), whereas fold growth correlated negatively with explant size (r = –0.55; P < 0.0001). Percentage of cells expressing the limbal epithelial cell marker K19 was higher in cells derived from large explants (99.1±1.2%) compared to cells derived from small explants (93.2±13.6%, P = 0.024). The percentage of cells expressing ABCG2, integrin β1, p63, and p63α that are markers suggestive of an immature phenotype; Keratin 3, Connexin 43, and E-Cadherin that are markers of differentiation; and Ki67 and PCNA that indicate cell proliferation were equal in both groups. Desmosome and hemidesmosome densities were equal between the groups. Conclusion For donor- and culture conditions used in the present study, large explants are preferable to small in terms of outgrowth area. As regards limbal epithelial cell thickness, stratification, mechanical strength, and the attainment of a predominantly immature phenotype, both large and small explants are sufficient.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherPLOS
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleEffects of explant size on epithelial outgrowth, thickness, stratification, ultrastructure and phenotype of cultured limbal epithelial cells
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorUtheim, Øygunn Aass
dc.creator.authorPasovic, Lara
dc.creator.authorRæder, Sten
dc.creator.authorEidet, Jon Roger
dc.creator.authorFostad, Ida
dc.creator.authorSehic, Amer
dc.creator.authorRoald, Borghild
dc.creator.authorde la Paz, Maria Fideliz
dc.creator.authorLyberg, Torstein
dc.creator.authorDartt, Darlene A.
dc.creator.authorUtheim, Tor Paaske
cristin.unitcode185,53,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for klinisk medisin
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1703532
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=PLOS ONE&rft.volume=14&rft.spage=&rft.date=2019
dc.identifier.jtitlePLOS ONE
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212524
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-77615
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/74507/2/Utheim_Cristin-post%2B1703532.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleide0212524
dc.relation.projectHSØ/2010092


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International