Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2020-04-06T18:35:35Z
dc.date.available2020-11-18T23:46:15Z
dc.date.created2019-09-29T13:55:16Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationLinnebo, Øystein Shapiro, Stewart . Realizability as a Kind of Truthmaking. Quo Vadis, Metaphysics. 2019 Walter de Gruyter
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/74396
dc.description.abstractThis paper is part of a larger project concerning potentiality in mathematics. The first and simplest case is the traditional Aristotelian notion of potential infinity. An issue much like that of truthmaking arises in our explication of one of the options for potential infinity, namely how to make sense of generalizations from that perspective.We use the traditional intuitionistic notion of realizability to resolve the issue, and to help settle the correct logic for one kind of potential infinity.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherWalter de Gruyter
dc.titleRealizability as a Kind of Truthmaking
dc.typeChapter
dc.creator.authorLinnebo, Øystein
dc.creator.authorShapiro, Stewart
cristin.unitcode185,14,33,20
cristin.unitnameFilosofi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
dc.identifier.cristin1730805
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.btitle=Quo Vadis, Metaphysics&rft.spage=&rft.date=2019
dc.identifier.startpage351
dc.identifier.endpage364
dc.identifier.pagecount500
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1515/9783110664812-020
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-77505
dc.type.documentBokkapittel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.isbn3110662493
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/74396/1/generality%2BOL.pdf
dc.type.versionAcceptedVersion
cristin.btitleQuo Vadis, Metaphysics
dc.relation.projectNFR/250654


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata