Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2020-02-07T20:03:59Z
dc.date.available2020-02-07T20:03:59Z
dc.date.created2018-07-20T11:57:58Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationHounslow, Mark W. Domeier, Mathew Biggin, Andrew J. . Subduction flux modulates the geomagnetic polarity reversal rate. Tectonophysics. 2018, 742-743, 34-49
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/72868
dc.description.abstractAscertaining the cause of variations in the frequency of geomagnetic polarity reversals through the Phanerozoic has remained a primary research question straddling paleomagnetism and geodynamics for decades. Numerical models suggest the primary control on geomagnetic reversal rates on 10 to 100 Ma timescales is the changing heat flux across the core-mantle boundary and that this is itself expected to be strongly influenced by variations in the flux of lithosphere subducted into the mantle. A positive relationship between the time-dependent global subduction flux and magnetic reversal rate is expected, with a time delay to transmit the thermal imprint into the lowermost mantle. We perform the first test of this hypothesis using subduction flux estimates and geomagnetic reversal rate data back to the early Paleozoic. Subduction area flux estimates are derived from global, full-plate tectonic models, and are evaluated against independent subduction flux proxies based on the global age distribution of detrital zircons and strontium isotopes. A continuous Phanerozoic reversal rate model is built from pre-existing compilations back to ~320 Ma plus a new reversal rate model in the data-sparse mid-to-early Paleozoic. Cross-correlation of the time-dependent subduction flux and geomagnetic reversal rate series reveals a significant correlation with a time delay of ~120 Ma (with reversals trailing the subduction flux). This time delay represents a value intermediate between the seismologically constrained time expected for a subducted slab to transit from the surface to the core-mantle boundary (~150–300 Ma), and the much shorter lag time predicted by some numerical models of mantle flow (~30–60 Ma). While the reason for this large discrepancy remains unclear, it is encouraging that our novel estimate of lag time represents a compromise between them. Although important uncertainties in our proposed relationship remain, these results cast new light on the dynamic connections between the surface and deep Earth, and will help to constrain new models linking mantle convection, the thermal evolution of the lowermost mantle and the geodynamo.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleSubduction flux modulates the geomagnetic polarity reversal rate
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorHounslow, Mark W.
dc.creator.authorDomeier, Mathew
dc.creator.authorBiggin, Andrew J.
cristin.unitcode185,15,22,40
cristin.unitnameSenter for Jordens utvikling og dynamikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1598093
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Tectonophysics&rft.volume=742-743&rft.spage=34&rft.date=2018
dc.identifier.jtitleTectonophysics
dc.identifier.volume742-743
dc.identifier.startpage34
dc.identifier.endpage49
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2018.05.018
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-75977
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0040-1951
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/72868/1/Hounslow_etal_2018.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
dc.relation.projectNFR/223272
dc.relation.projectNFR/250111


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International