Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2020-01-17T19:09:19Z
dc.date.available2020-01-17T19:09:19Z
dc.date.created2018-07-05T13:52:01Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationVerket, Nina Julie Andersen, Marit Helen Sandvik, Leiv Tanbo, Tom Gunnar Qvigstad, Erik . Lack of cross-cultural validity of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30. Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders (JEPPD). 2018, 10(2), 107-115
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/72303
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The Endometriosis Health Profile-30 is a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure of health-related quality of life. Cross-cultural validation of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 has been performed for several translated versions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the measurement properties of a Norwegian version Endometriosis Health Profile-30. Methods: This study was designed as a cross-sectional anonymous postal questionnaire study. A total of 157 women with endometriosis were included during a period from 2012 to 2013. Women aged 18–45 years were recruited from the Norwegian Endometriosis Association. Principal components analysis with varimax rotation was used to assess construct validity. Short Form-36 was used to determine convergent validity. Cronbach’s alpha was used to measure internal consistency. Intraclass correlation coefficients and paired t-tests were used to evaluate test–retest reliability. Floor and ceiling effects were estimated. Results: Factor analysis resulted in a three and five-factor model for the core and modular questionnaire, respectively. Factor analysis could not support construct validity of the scales self-image and treatment. The Norwegian version Endometriosis Health Profile-30 demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and test–retest reliability, except for the scale relationship with children. Floor effects were observed for the scales self-image (20.1%), work life (33.9%), relationship with children (34.2%), and medical profession (20.5%). Conclusion: The construct self-image does not seem to be measured appropriately by the Norwegian version Endometriosis Health Profile-30, suggesting a lack of cross-cultural validity of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30. With multinational studies increasing, adequate translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and cross-cultural validation of instruments are essential to ensure equivalence in languages and cultures other than the original.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltd.
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.titleLack of cross-cultural validity of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorVerket, Nina Julie
dc.creator.authorAndersen, Marit Helen
dc.creator.authorSandvik, Leiv
dc.creator.authorTanbo, Tom Gunnar
dc.creator.authorQvigstad, Erik
cristin.unitcode185,53,45,0
cristin.unitnameKvinneklinikken
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1595923
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders (JEPPD)&rft.volume=10&rft.spage=107&rft.date=2018
dc.identifier.jtitleJournal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders (JEPPD)
dc.identifier.volume10
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage107
dc.identifier.endpage115
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/2284026518780638
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-75418
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2284-0265
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/72303/2/Verket_et_al_2018.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International