Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2019-12-09T19:49:13Z
dc.date.available2019-12-09T19:49:13Z
dc.date.created2019-01-10T09:58:05Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationBraovac, Susan McQueen, Caitlin Sahlstedt, Malin Kutzke, Hartmut Lucejko, Jeannette J. Klokkernes, Torunn . Navigating conservation strategies: linking material research on alum-treated wood from the Oseberg collection to conservation decisions. Heritage Science. 2018, 6, 77
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/71463
dc.description.abstractFrom the mid-1800s to the late 1950s, conservation by alum salts (aluminum potassium sulfate dodecahydrate)—with some variations—was a routine method for treating highly deteriorated waterlogged archaeological wood in many countries, especially in Scandinavia. It was eventually replaced by newer methods in the 1960s, such as that using polyethylene glycol. Accordingly, the signs of deterioration in such collections and the reasons behind them are not well known among current preservation specialists. The research in the Saving Oseberg project (2014–2019) has shed light on the consequences of this treatment and reasons behind the severe deterioration observed today in many objects of the Oseberg Viking Age wooden finds, which were conserved in the early 1900s. Saving Oseberg aims to provide research-based recommendations for the future preservation of the finds, and as such, a large part of the project is aimed at improving our understanding of this complex material. Here the consequences of the method are summarized, drawing on the research to date. Chemical analyses of the Oseberg wood showed its current condition to be highly degraded: little polysaccharide content is left and the lignin is significantly oxidized and extensively depolymerized. The conservation implications are also discussed.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleNavigating conservation strategies: linking material research on alum-treated wood from the Oseberg collection to conservation decisions
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorBraovac, Susan
dc.creator.authorMcQueen, Caitlin
dc.creator.authorSahlstedt, Malin
dc.creator.authorKutzke, Hartmut
dc.creator.authorLucejko, Jeannette J.
dc.creator.authorKlokkernes, Torunn
cristin.unitcode185,27,85,30
cristin.unitnameSaving Oseberg
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1653766
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Heritage Science&rft.volume=6&rft.spage=77&rft.date=2018
dc.identifier.jtitleHeritage Science
dc.identifier.volume6
dc.identifier.startpage77
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-018-0241-y
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-74561
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2050-7445
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/71463/1/Braovac%2Bet%2Bal%252C%2B2018%252C%2BNavigating%2Bconservation%2Bstrategies.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International