Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2019-12-05T20:22:06Z
dc.date.available2019-12-05T20:22:06Z
dc.date.created2018-09-28T10:26:14Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationTeweldebrhan, Aynom Tesfay Burkhart, John Schuler, Thomas . Parameter uncertainty analysis for an operational hydrological model using residual-based and limits of acceptability approaches. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2018, 22(9), 5021-5039
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/71238
dc.description.abstractParameter uncertainty estimation is one of the major challenges in hydrological modeling. Here we present parameter uncertainty analysis of a recently released distributed conceptual hydrological model applied in the Nea catchment, Norway. Two variants of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) methodologies, one based on the residuals and the other on the limits of acceptability, were employed. Streamflow and remote sensing snow cover data were used in conditioning model parameters and in model validation. When using the GLUE limit of acceptability (GLUE LOA) approach, a streamflow observation error of 25 % was assumed. Neither the original limits nor relaxing the limits up to a physically meaningful value yielded a behavioral model capable of predicting streamflow within the limits in 100 % of the observations. As an alternative to relaxing the limits, the requirement for the percentage of model predictions falling within the original limits was relaxed. An empirical approach was introduced to define the degree of relaxation. The result shows that snow- and water-balance-related parameters induce relatively higher streamflow uncertainty than catchment response parameters. Comparable results were obtained from behavioral models selected using the two GLUE methodologies.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherCopernicus
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleParameter uncertainty analysis for an operational hydrological model using residual-based and limits of acceptability approaches
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorTeweldebrhan, Aynom Tesfay
dc.creator.authorBurkhart, John
dc.creator.authorSchuler, Thomas
cristin.unitcode185,15,22,60
cristin.unitnameSeksjon for naturgeografi og hydrologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.cristin1615500
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Hydrology and Earth System Sciences&rft.volume=22&rft.spage=5021&rft.date=2018
dc.identifier.jtitleHydrology and Earth System Sciences
dc.identifier.volume22
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.startpage5021
dc.identifier.endpage5039
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5021-2018
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-74319
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1027-5606
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/71238/2/hess-22-5021-2018.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
dc.relation.projectNFR/244024


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International