Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2019-11-26T19:26:01Z
dc.date.available2019-11-26T19:26:01Z
dc.date.created2014-11-25T21:55:49Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationBraaten, Hans Fredrik Veiteberg Harman, Christopher Peter Øverjordet, Ida Beathe Larssen, Thorjørn . Effects of sample preparation on methylmercury concentrations in arctic organisms. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry. 2014, 94(9), 863-873
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/71033
dc.description.abstractThe biogeochemical cycling of mercury (Hg) in the marine environment is an issue of global concern, as consumption of marine fish is a major route of human exposure to the toxic specie methylmercury (MeHg). The most widely utilised and accepted technique for preparing biological tissue samples for the analysis of MeHg involves an alkaline digestion of the sample. Recent studies suggest, however, that this technique is inadequate to produce satisfactory recoveries for certain biological samples, including fish, fur, feathers and other ‘indicator’ tissues which contain relatively high levels of MeHg. Thus an improved acidic extraction method has been proven to produce more satisfactory results for a wide range of biological tissues. The present study compares the two methods on real sample material from different organisms of an Arctic marine food chain, and shows how this could lead to misinterpretation of analytical results. Results show significantly (p < 0.05) lower concentrations for alkaline digestion for large parts of the food chain; especially in fish and birds. The mean differences in concentrations found between the two different methods were 28, 31 and 25% for fish (Polar and Atlantic cod), Little Auk and Kittiwake, respectively. For samples lower in the food chain (i.e. zooplankton and krill) no significant differences were found. This leads to a clear underestimation of the levels of MeHg found higher up in these food chains; the ratio of MeHg to Hg in biological samples; and thus potentially erroneous conclusions drawn from these results concerning the biological cycling of mercury species. We hypothesise that the main reasons for these differences are poor extraction efficiency and/or matrix effects on the ethylation step prior to analysis. This is the first study to examine the effects of these artefacts on real environmental samples covering a complete food chain.
dc.description.abstractEffects of sample preparation on methylmercury concentrations in arctic organisms
dc.languageEN
dc.titleEffects of sample preparation on methylmercury concentrations in arctic organisms
dc.title.alternativeENEngelskEnglishEffects of sample preparation on methylmercury concentrations in arctic organisms
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorBraaten, Hans Fredrik Veiteberg
dc.creator.authorHarman, Christopher Peter
dc.creator.authorØverjordet, Ida Beathe
dc.creator.authorLarssen, Thorjørn
cristin.unitcode185,15,12,0
cristin.unitnameKjemisk institutt
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1177072
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry&rft.volume=94&rft.spage=863&rft.date=2014
dc.identifier.jtitleInternational Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry
dc.identifier.volume94
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.startpage863
dc.identifier.endpage873
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2014.900678
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-74156
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0306-7319
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/71033/2/1177072.pdf
dc.type.versionAcceptedVersion
dc.relation.projectNFR/196295


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata