Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2019-06-21T05:31:07Z
dc.date.available2019-06-21T05:31:07Z
dc.date.created2019-04-16T16:34:53Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationHelgeland, Jon Tomic, Oliver Hansen, Tonya Moen Kristoffersen, Doris Tove Hassani, Sahar Lindahl, Anne Karin . Postoperative wound dehiscence after laparotomy: a useful healthcare quality indicator? A cohort study based on Norwegian hospital administrative data. BMJ Open. 2019, 9(4)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/68461
dc.description.abstractObjectives Postoperative wound dehiscence (PWD) is a serious complication to laparotomy, leading to higher mortality, readmissions and cost. The aims of the present study are to investigate whether risk adjusted PWD rates could reliably differentiate between Norwegian hospitals, and whether PWD rates were associated with hospital characteristics such as hospital type and laparotomy volume. Design Observational study using patient administrative data from all Norwegian hospitals, obtained from the Norwegian Patient Registry, for the period 2011–2015, and linked using the unique person identification number. Participants All patients undergoing laparotomy, aged at least 15 years, with length of stay at least 2 days and no diagnosis code for immunocompromised state or relating to pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium. The final data set comprised 66 925 patients with 78 086 laparotomy episodes from 47 hospitals. Outcomes The outcome was wound dehiscence, identified by the presence of a wound reclosure code, risk adjusted for patient characteristics and operation type. Results The final data set comprised 1477 wound dehiscences. Crude PWD rates varied from 0% to 5.1% among hospitals, with an overall rate of 1.89%. Three hospitals with statistically significantly higher PWD than average were identified, after case mix adjustment and correction for multiple comparisons. Hospital volume was not associated with PWD rate, except that hospitals with very few laparotomies had lower PWD rates. Conclusions Among Norwegian hospitals, there is considerable variation in PWD rate that cannot be explained by operation type, age or comorbidity. This warrants further investigation into possible causes, such as surgical technique, perioperative procedures or handling of complications. The risk adjusted PWD rate after laparotomy is a candidate quality indicator for Norwegian hospitals.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.titlePostoperative wound dehiscence after laparotomy: a useful healthcare quality indicator? A cohort study based on Norwegian hospital administrative data
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorHelgeland, Jon
dc.creator.authorTomic, Oliver
dc.creator.authorHansen, Tonya Moen
dc.creator.authorKristoffersen, Doris Tove
dc.creator.authorHassani, Sahar
dc.creator.authorLindahl, Anne Karin
cristin.unitcode185,53,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for klinisk medisin
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1692982
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=BMJ Open&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=&rft.date=2019
dc.identifier.jtitleBMJ Open
dc.identifier.volume9
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.pagecount7
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026422
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-71616
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/68461/2/Helgeland_2019_Pos.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleide026422


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International