Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2019-02-18T11:30:59Z
dc.date.available2020-05-19T22:46:29Z
dc.date.created2018-11-26T11:57:15Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationToussaint, Renaud Aharonov, Einat Koehn, Daniel Gratier, Jean-Pierre Ebner, Martin Baud, Patrick Rolland, Alexandra Renard, Francois . Stylolites: A review. Journal of Structural Geology. 2018, 114, 163-195
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/66590
dc.description.abstractStylolites are ubiquitous geo-patterns observed in rocks in the upper crust, from geological reservoirs in sedimentary rocks to deformation zones, in folds, faults, and shear zones. These rough surfaces play a major role in the dissolution of rocks around stressed contacts, the transport of dissolved material and the precipitation in surrounding pores. Consequently, they play an active role in the evolution of rock microstructures and rheological properties in the Earth's crust. They are observed individually or in networks, in proximity to fractures and joints, and in numerous geological settings. This review article deals with their geometrical and compositional characteristics and the factors leading to their genesis. The main questions this review focuses on are the following: How do they form? How can they be used to measure strain and formation stress? How do they control fluid flow in the upper crust? Geometrically, stylolites have fractal roughness, with fractal geometrical properties exhibiting typically three scaling regimes: a self-affine scaling with Hurst exponent 1.1 ± 0.1 at small scale (up to tens or hundreds of microns), another one with Hurst exponent around 0.5 to 0.6 at intermediate scale (up to millimeters or centimeters), and in the case of sedimentary stylolites, a flat scaling at large scale. More complicated anisotropic scaling (scaling laws depending of the direction of the profile considered) is found in the case of tectonic stylolites. We report models based on first principles from physical chemistry and statistical physics, including a mechanical component for the free-energy associated with stress concentrations, and a precise tracking of the influence of grain-scale heterogeneities and disorder on the resulting (micro)structures. Experimental efforts to reproduce stylolites in the laboratory are also reviewed. We show that although micrometer-size stylolite teeth are obtained in laboratory experiments, teeth deforming numerous grains have not yet been obtained experimentally, which is understandable given the very long formation time of such geometries. Finally, the applications of stylolites as strain and stress markers, to determine paleostress magnitude are reviewed. We show that the scalings in stylolite heights and the crossover scale between these scalings can be used to determine the stress magnitude (its scalar value) perpendicular to the stylolite surface during the stylolite formation, and that the stress anisotropy in the stylolite plane can be determined for the case of tectonic stylolites. We also show that the crossover between medium (millimetric) scales and large (pluricentimetric) scales, in the case of sedimentary stylolites, provides a good marker for the total amount of dissolution, which is still valid even when the largest teeth start to dissolve – which leads to the loss of information, since the total deformation is not anymore recorded in a single marker structure. We discuss the impact of the stylolites on the evolution of the transport properties of the hosting rock, and show that they promote a permeability increase parallel to the stylolites, whereas their effect on the permeability transverse to the stylolite can be negligible, or may reduce the permeability, depending on the development of the stylolite.en_US
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherPergamon Press
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleStylolites: A reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.creator.authorToussaint, Renaud
dc.creator.authorAharonov, Einat
dc.creator.authorKoehn, Daniel
dc.creator.authorGratier, Jean-Pierre
dc.creator.authorEbner, Martin
dc.creator.authorBaud, Patrick
dc.creator.authorRolland, Alexandra
dc.creator.authorRenard, Francois
cristin.unitcode185,15,4,98
cristin.unitnamePorous Media Laboratory SFF
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.cristin1635022
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal of Structural Geology&rft.volume=114&rft.spage=163&rft.date=2018
dc.identifier.jtitleJournal of Structural Geology
dc.identifier.volume114
dc.identifier.startpage163
dc.identifier.endpage195
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2018.05.003
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-69780
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0191-8141
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/66590/4/2018-ToussaintAharonov...RollandRenard-StyloReview.pdf
dc.type.versionAcceptedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International