Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2019-02-06T09:54:24Z
dc.date.available2019-02-06T09:54:24Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/66407
dc.description.abstractThe doctoral thesis is written within the field of educational psychology, and has examined issues related to task-oriented reading processes with multiple documents in upper-secondary school students. More specifically, the aim of the thesis has been to study what students attend to when they select documents in order to solve tasks concerning socio-scientific issues. This aim have been examined through the thesis’ three papers using mixed, quantitative and qualitative methods, respectively. Jointly, the three papers and the extended abstract emphasizes readers’ purposeful interaction with complex and multiple documents as a core reading skill needed in our information society. By offering insight into document selection processes, individual differences in these processes, and readers’ justifications for their selective reading behavior, the relation between what individuals bring to the reading task and how and what they read have been characterizing for the findings in the thesis.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.haspartPaper I: McCrudden, M.T., Stenseth. T., Bråten, I. & Strømsø, H.I. (2016). The effects of topic familiarity, author expertise, and content relevance on Norwegian students’ document selection: A mixed methods study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(2), 147-162. The paper is not available in DUO due to publisher restrictions. The published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000057
dc.relation.haspartPaper II: Stenseth, T., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H.I. (2016). Investigating interest and knowledge as predictors of students’ attitudes towards socio-scientific issues. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 274-280. The paper is included in the thesis. Also available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.005
dc.relation.haspartPaper III: Stenseth, T. & Strømsø, H.I. (2018). To read or not to read: A qualitative study of students’ justifications for document selection in task-oriented reading. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. The paper is not available in DUO due to publisher restrictions. The published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2018.1434828
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000057
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.005
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2018.1434828
dc.titleHow and what students read: A study of evaluation and document selection processes in task-oriented readingen_US
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen_US
dc.creator.authorStenseth, Tonje
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-69595
dc.type.documentDoktoravhandlingen_US
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/66407/1/PhD-Stenseth-2019.pdf


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata