Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2018-11-29T14:05:39Z
dc.date.available2018-11-29T14:05:39Z
dc.date.created2016-10-28T12:27:17Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationReme, Silje Tveito, Torill Helene Harris, Anette Lie, Stein Atle Grasdal, Astrid Indahl, Aage Brox, Jens Ivar Tangen, Tone Hagen, Eli Molde Gismervik, Sigmund Østgård Ødegård, Arit Frøyland, Livar Fors, Egil Andreas Chalder, Trudie Eriksen, Hege Randi . Cognitive Interventions and Nutritional Supplements (The CINS Trial): A Randomized Controlled, Multicenter Trial Comparing a Brief Intervention with Additional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Seal Oil, and Soy Oil for Sick-Listed Low Back Pain Patients. Spine. 2016, 41(20), 1557-1564
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/65830
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a tailored and manualized cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) or nutritional supplements of seal oil and soy oil had any additional benefits over a brief cognitive intervention (BI) on return to work (RTW). Summary of Background Data. Brief intervention programs are clinically beneficial and cost-effective for patients with low back pain (LBP). CBT is recommended for LBP, but evidence on RTW is lacking. Seal oil has previously been shown to have a possible effect on muscle pain, but no randomized controlled trials have so far been carried out in LBP patients. Methods: Four hundred thirteen adults aged 18 to 60 years were included. Participants were sick-listed 2 to 10 months due to LBP. Main outcome was objectively ascertained work participation at 12-month follow-up. Participants were randomly assigned to BI (n ¼ 100), BI and CBT (n ¼ 103), BI and seal oil (n ¼ 105), or BI and soy oil (n ¼ 105). BI is a two-session cognitive, clinical examination program followed by two booster sessions, while the CBT program is a tailored, individual, sevensession manual-based treatment. Results: At 12-month follow-up, 60% of the participants in the BI group, 50% in the BI and CBT group, 51% in the BI and seal oil group, and 53% in the BI and soy oil group showed reduced sick leave from baseline, and had either partly or fully RTW. The differences between the groups were not statistically significant (x2 ¼ 2.54, P ¼ 0.47). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups at any of the other follow-up assessments either, except for a significantly lower sick leave rate in the BI group than the other groups during the first 3 months of follow-up (x2¼ 9.50, P ¼ 0.02). Conclusion: CBT and seal oil had no additional benefits over a brief cognitive intervention on sick leave. The brief cognitive intervention alone was superior in facilitating a fast RTW.en_US
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleCognitive Interventions and Nutritional Supplements (The CINS Trial): A Randomized Controlled, Multicenter Trial Comparing a Brief Intervention with Additional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Seal Oil, and Soy Oil for Sick-Listed Low Back Pain Patientsen_US
dc.title.alternativeENEngelskEnglishCognitive Interventions and Nutritional Supplements (The CINS Trial): A Randomized Controlled, Multicenter Trial Comparing a Brief Intervention with Additional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Seal Oil, and Soy Oil for Sick-Listed Low Back Pain Patients
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.creator.authorReme, Silje
dc.creator.authorTveito, Torill Helene
dc.creator.authorHarris, Anette
dc.creator.authorLie, Stein Atle
dc.creator.authorGrasdal, Astrid
dc.creator.authorIndahl, Aage
dc.creator.authorBrox, Jens Ivar
dc.creator.authorTangen, Tone
dc.creator.authorHagen, Eli Molde
dc.creator.authorGismervik, Sigmund Østgård
dc.creator.authorØdegård, Arit
dc.creator.authorFrøyland, Livar
dc.creator.authorFors, Egil Andreas
dc.creator.authorChalder, Trudie
dc.creator.authorEriksen, Hege Randi
cristin.unitcode185,17,5,0
cristin.unitnamePsykologisk institutt
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.cristin1395369
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Spine&rft.volume=41&rft.spage=1557&rft.date=2016
dc.identifier.jtitleSpine
dc.identifier.volume41
dc.identifier.issue20
dc.identifier.startpage1557
dc.identifier.endpage1564
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001596
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-68252
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0362-2436
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/65830/1/00007632-201610150-00002_HVL.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International