Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2018-11-15T13:53:50Z
dc.date.available2018-11-15T13:53:50Z
dc.date.created2018-03-13T14:54:32Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationPeet, Andrew Robert . Normal Knowledge: Toward an Explanation-Based Theory of Knowledge. Journal of Philosophy. 2018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/65547
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we argue that knowledge is characteristically safe true belief. We argue that an adequate approach to epistemic luck must not be indexed to methods of belief formation, but rather to explanations for belief. This shift is problematic for several prominent approaches to the theory of knowledge, including virtue reliabilism and proper functionalism (as normally conceived). The view that knowledge is characteristically safe true belief is better able to accommodate the shift in question.en_US
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherPhilosophy Documentation Center
dc.titleNormal Knowledge: Toward an Explanation-Based Theory of Knowledgeen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.creator.authorPeet, Andrew Robert
cristin.unitcode185,14,33,70
cristin.unitnameSenter for studier av rasjonell, språklig og moralsk handling
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.cristin1572580
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal of Philosophy&rft.volume=&rft.spage=&rft.date=2018
dc.identifier.jtitleJournal of Philosophy
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-68171
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.source.issn0022-362X
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/65547/1/Final%2B-%2BNormal%2BKnowledge%252C%2Btoward%2Ban%2Bexplanation%2Bbased%2Btheory%2Bof%2Bknowledge.pdf
dc.type.versionSubmittedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata