Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2018-10-23T11:41:09Z
dc.date.available2018-10-23T11:41:09Z
dc.date.created2018-01-10T10:01:36Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationOetzel, Jennifer Miklian, Jason . Multinational enterprises, risk management, and the business and economics of peace. Multinational Business Review. 2017, 25(4), 270-286
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/65244
dc.description.abstractPurpose The purpose of this paper is to reconceptualize how managers of multinational enterprises (MNEs) manage risk, particularly in fragile and/or conflict-affected areas of operation. The authors suggest that MNEs consider reducing risk at its source rather than trying to avoid or react to risks as they occur. By incorporating peacebuilding strategies, managers may not only reduce investment risk but also contribute to stability and prosperity in the communities where they operate, and gain a competitive advantage in doing so. Design/methodology/approach The authors show how firms can take a more holistic approach to working in conflict-affected areas. They do so by overlaying conceptualizations of risk with those of peacebuilding and then use case examples to illustrate how such actions work in practice. Findings Using a series of examples, the authors find that MNEs that incorporate peacebuilding frameworks in their risk calculations in complex settings tend to have a better understanding of local environments and how they affect firm operations and profitability. These same MNEs may hold a long-term advantage over international competitors that do not share the same understanding. Originality/value The authors argue that the study of relationships between international businesses and society in conflict-affected or fragile areas of operation is under-developed and tends to focus on negative (risk-aversion) aspects as opposed to positive (value-added) opportunities. This paper offers new ways in which these relationships can be reconceptualized. The authors’ main takeaway is that a peacebuilding approach does not require corporations to be arbitrators of peace at the expense of profit. Rather, it is instead a broader way to conceptualize and weigh risk when working in the world’s most challenging regions. This approach is more likely to be in the long-term interest of both the firm and the local society where the firm operates.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleMultinational enterprises, risk management, and the business and economics of peace
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorOetzel, Jennifer
dc.creator.authorMiklian, Jason
cristin.unitcode185,29,1,0
cristin.unitnameSenter for utvikling og miljø
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1539506
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Multinational Business Review&rft.volume=25&rft.spage=270&rft.date=2017
dc.identifier.jtitleMultinational Business Review
dc.identifier.volume25
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage270
dc.identifier.endpage286
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MBR-09-2017-0064
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-67791
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1525-383X
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/65244/1/Jason%2BMikliaN.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International