Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2018-09-07T10:40:31Z
dc.date.available2018-09-07T10:40:31Z
dc.date.created2018-07-13T09:37:41Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationvan de Velde, Stijn Rita Patrick Kortteisto, Tiina Spitaels, David Jamtvedt, Gro Roshanov, Pavel Kunnamo, Ilkka Aertgeerts, Bert Vandvik, Per Olav Flottorp, Signe . Development of a tailored intervention with computerized clinical decision support to improve quality of care for patients with knee osteoarthritis: Multi-method study. JMIR Research Protocols. 2018, 7(6)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/64208
dc.description.abstractBackground: Clinical practice patterns greatly diverge from evidence-based recommendations to manage knee osteoarthritis conservatively before resorting to surgery. Objective: This study aimed to tailor a guideline-based computerized decision support (CDS) intervention that facilitates the conservative management of knee osteoarthritis. Methods: Experts with backgrounds in clinical medicine, research, implementation, or health informatics suggested the most important recommendations for implementation, how to develop an implementation strategy, and how to form the CDS algorithms. In 6 focus group sessions, 8 general practitioners and 22 patients from Norway, Belgium, and Finland discussed the suggested CDS intervention and identified factors that would be most critical for the success of the intervention. The focus group moderators used the GUideline Implementation with DEcision Support checklist, which we developed to support consideration of CDS success factors. Results: The experts prioritized 9 out of 22 recommendations for implementation. We formed the concept for 6 CDS algorithms to support implementation of these recommendations. The focus group suggested 59 unique factors that could affect the success of the presented CDS intervention. Five factors (out of the 59) were prioritized by focus group participants in every country, including the perceived potential to address the information needs of both patients and general practitioners; the credibility of CDS information; the timing of CDS for patients; and the need for personal dialogue about CDS between the general practitioner and the patient. Conclusions: The focus group participants supported the CDS intervention as a tool to improve the quality of care for patients with knee osteoarthritis through shared, evidence-based decision making. We aim to develop and implement the CDS based on these study results. Future research should address optimal ways to (1) provide patient-directed CDS, (2) enable more patient-specific CDS within the context of patient complexity, and (3) maintain user engagement with CDS over time.en_US
dc.languageEN
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleDevelopment of a tailored intervention with computerized clinical decision support to improve quality of care for patients with knee osteoarthritis: Multi-method studyen_US
dc.title.alternativeENEngelskEnglishDevelopment of a tailored intervention with computerized clinical decision support to improve quality of care for patients with knee osteoarthritis: Multi-method study
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.creator.authorvan de Velde, Stijn Rita Patrick
dc.creator.authorKortteisto, Tiina
dc.creator.authorSpitaels, David
dc.creator.authorJamtvedt, Gro
dc.creator.authorRoshanov, Pavel
dc.creator.authorKunnamo, Ilkka
dc.creator.authorAertgeerts, Bert
dc.creator.authorVandvik, Per Olav
dc.creator.authorFlottorp, Signe
cristin.unitcode185,52,11,0
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for helseledelse og helseøkonomi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1597051
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=JMIR Research Protocols&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=&rft.date=2018
dc.identifier.jtitleJMIR Research Protocols
dc.identifier.volume7
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pagecount14
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2196/resprot.9927
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-66759
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1929-0748
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/64208/2/VandeVelde_2018_Dev.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleide154


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International