Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2018-08-28T09:56:48Z
dc.date.available2018-08-28T09:56:48Z
dc.date.created2017-11-09T09:07:11Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationCamps, Diana Maria . Legitimating Limburgish: The Reproduction of Heritage. Standardizing minority languages: Competing ideologies of authority and authenticity in the global periphery. 2017, 66-83 Routledge
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/63795
dc.description.abstractThis chapter examines the (re)production of heritage discourses in relation to processes of standardization and language legitimation. In 1997, Limburgish, formerly considered a dialect of Dutch, was acknowledged by local and national authorities as a regional language under the European Charter for Regional and Minority Languages (ECRML). This treaty, under the auspices of the Council of Europe, provides the main framework for the protection and promotion of regional and minority languages as cultural heritage. The inclusion of Limburgish under the ECRML directed renewed focus to establishing and promoting spelling norms applicable to the various Limburgian dialects. Although the ECRML does not explicitly require standardization for languages protected under level II, this has been an area of significant activity, suggesting it plays a role in the local processes of language legitimation. The interest here is in demonstrating how policies decided at provincial or national level are taken up locally by social actors involved in language promotion. This investigation focuses on how a teacher in a local classroom appropriates an ideology of heritage to create legitimacy both for himself as a person with the authority to speak about prescriptive norms for Limburgish and for the local dialect. The data show that, in contrast to the heritage discourse articulated at European, national, and regional scales which valorizes Limburgish through discourses of shared heritage and language endangerment, at the local level, heritage also articulates with discourses of historicity and difference and is closely linked to a discourse of linguistic expertise. This chapter highlights how discourses entextualized in policy texts are taken up, adapted, and modified at the local scale to create legitimacy for Limburgish as a language.en_US
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleLegitimating Limburgish: The Reproduction of Heritageen_US
dc.typeChapteren_US
dc.creator.authorCamps, Diana Maria
cristin.unitcode185,14,35,80
cristin.unitnameCenter for Multilingualism in Society across the Lifespan
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
dc.identifier.cristin1512468
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.btitle=Standardizing minority languages: Competing ideologies of authority and authenticity in the global periphery&rft.spage=66&rft.date=2017
dc.identifier.startpage66
dc.identifier.endpage83
dc.identifier.pagecount249
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-66437
dc.type.documentBokkapittelen_US
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.isbn978-1-315-64772-2
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/63795/2/Camps%2BLegitimating%2BLimburgish.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.btitleStandardizing minority languages: Competing ideologies of authority and authenticity in the global periphery
dc.relation.projectNFR/223265
dc.relation.projectNFR/213831


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International