Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2018-08-27T09:36:13Z
dc.date.available2018-08-27T09:36:13Z
dc.date.created2017-12-07T15:56:50Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationOku, Afiong Oyo-Ita, Angela Glenton, Claire Fretheim, Atle Ames, Heather Muloliwa, Artur Manuel Kaufman, Jessica Hill, Sophie Cliff, Julie Cartier, Yuri Owoaje, Eme Bosch-Capblanch, Xavier Rada, Gabriel Lewin, Simon . Perceptions and experiences of childhood vaccination communication strategies among caregivers and health workers in Nigeria: A qualitative study. PLoS ONE. 2017, 12(11)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/63784
dc.description.abstractBackground: Effective vaccination communication with parents is critical in efforts to overcome barriers to childhood vaccination, tackle vaccine hesitancy and improve vaccination coverage. Health workers should be able to provide information to parents and other caregivers and support them in reaching decisions about vaccinating their children. Limited information exists regarding the perceptions of caregivers and health workers on the vaccination communication strategies employed in Nigeria. This study, which forms part of the ‘Communicate to vaccinate’ (COMMVAC) project, aims to explore the perceptions and experiences of caregivers and health workers in Nigeria on vaccination communication strategies implemented in their settings. Methodology: We conducted the study in two States: Bauchi in Northern Nigeria and Cross River in the south. We carried out observations (n = 40), in-depth interviews (n = 14) and focus group discussions (FGDs) (n = 12) amongst 14 purposively selected health workers, two community leaders and 84 caregivers in the two states. We transcribed data verbatim and analysed the data using a framework analysis approach. Results: Caregivers were informed about vaccination activities through three main sources: health facilities (during health education sessions conducted at antenatal or immunization clinics); media outlets; and announcements (in churches/mosques, communities and markets). Caregivers reported that the information received was very useful. Their preferred sources of information included phone text messages, town announcers, media and church/mosque announcements. Some caregivers perceived the clinic environment, long waiting times and health worker attitudes as barriers to receiving vaccination information.When delivering communication interventions, health workers described issues tied to poor communication skills; poor motivation; and attitudes of community members, including vaccine resistance. Conclusion: Communication about vaccination involves more than the message but is also influenced by the environment and the attitudes of the deliverer and receiver. It is pertinent for health policy makers and programme managers to understand these factors so as to effectively implement communication approaches.en_US
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation.ispartofOku, Afiong (2019) Childhood Vaccination Communication in Nigeria: A qualitative study. Doctoral thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10852/73999
dc.relation.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/73999
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titlePerceptions and experiences of childhood vaccination communication strategies among caregivers and health workers in Nigeria: A qualitative studyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.creator.authorOku, Afiong
dc.creator.authorOyo-Ita, Angela
dc.creator.authorGlenton, Claire
dc.creator.authorFretheim, Atle
dc.creator.authorAmes, Heather
dc.creator.authorMuloliwa, Artur Manuel
dc.creator.authorKaufman, Jessica
dc.creator.authorHill, Sophie
dc.creator.authorCliff, Julie
dc.creator.authorCartier, Yuri
dc.creator.authorOwoaje, Eme
dc.creator.authorBosch-Capblanch, Xavier
dc.creator.authorRada, Gabriel
dc.creator.authorLewin, Simon
cristin.unitcode185,52,14,0
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for samfunnsmedisin og global helse
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1524446
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=PLoS ONE&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=&rft.date=2017
dc.identifier.jtitlePLoS ONE
dc.identifier.volume12
dc.identifier.issue11
dc.identifier.pagecount21
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186733
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-66335
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/63784/1/Oku_2017_Per.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleide0186733


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International