Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2018-08-07T14:09:36Z
dc.date.available2018-08-07T14:09:36Z
dc.date.created2018-01-25T19:53:46Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationLinnebo, Øystein Cook, Roy . Cardinality and Acceptable Abstraction. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. 2018, 59(1), 61-74
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/62734
dc.description.abstractIt is widely thought that the acceptability of an abstraction principle is a feature of the cardinalities at which it is satisfiable. This view is called into question by a recent observation by Richard Heck. We show that a fix proposed by Heck fails but we analyze the interesting idea on which it is based, namely that an acceptable abstraction has to “generate” the objects that it requires. We also correct and complete the classification of proposed criteria for acceptable abstraction.en_US
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherUniversity of Notre Dame
dc.titleCardinality and Acceptable Abstractionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.creator.authorLinnebo, Øystein
dc.creator.authorCook, Roy
cristin.unitcode185,14,33,20
cristin.unitnameFilosofi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.cristin1552247
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic&rft.volume=59&rft.spage=61&rft.date=2018
dc.identifier.jtitleNotre Dame Journal of Formal Logic
dc.identifier.volume59
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage61
dc.identifier.endpage74
dc.identifier.doi10.1215/00294527-2017-0012
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-65303
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0029-4527
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/62734/2/cleaning_up.pdf
dc.type.versionAcceptedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata