Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2018-07-23T13:23:42Z
dc.date.available2018-07-23T13:23:42Z
dc.date.created2018-01-03T23:21:24Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationPapageorgiou, Spyridon Keilig, Ludger Vandevska-Radunovic, Vaska Eliades, Theodore Bourauel, Christoph . Torque differences due to the material variation of the orthodontic appliance: a finite element study. Progress in Orthodontics. 2017, 18(1)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/62420
dc.description.abstractBackground: Torque of the maxillary incisors is crucial to occlusal relationship and esthetics and can be influenced by many factors. The aim of this study was to assess the relative influence of the material of the orthodontic appliance (adhesive, bracket, ligature, and wire) on tooth displacements and developed stresses/strains after torque application. Methods: A three-dimensional upper right central incisor with its periodontal ligament (PDL) and alveolus was modeled. A 0.018-in. slot discovery® (Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany) bracket with a rectangular 0.018 x 0.025-in. wire was generated. The orthodontic appliance varied in the material of its components: adhesive (composite resin or resin-modified glass ionomer cement), bracket (titanium, steel, or ceramic), wire (beta-titanium or steel), and ligature (elastomeric or steel). A total of 24 models were generated, and a palatal root torque of 5° was applied. Afterwards, crown and apex displacement, strains in the PDL, and stresses in the bracket were calculated and analyzed. Results: The labial crown displacement and the palatal root displacement of the tooth were mainly influenced by the material of the wire (up to 150% variation), followed by the material of the bracket (up to 19% variation). The magnitude of strains developed in the PDL was primarily influenced by the material of the wire (up to 127% variation), followed by the material of the bracket (up to 30% variation) and the ligature (up to 13% variation). Finally, stresses developed at the bracket were mainly influenced by the material of the wire (up to 118% variation) and the bracket (up to 59% variation). Conclusions: The material properties of the orthodontic appliance and all its components should be considered during torque application. However, these in silico results need to be validated in vivo before they can be clinically extrapolated.en_US
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleTorque differences due to the material variation of the orthodontic appliance: a finite element studyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.creator.authorPapageorgiou, Spyridon
dc.creator.authorKeilig, Ludger
dc.creator.authorVandevska-Radunovic, Vaska
dc.creator.authorEliades, Theodore
dc.creator.authorBourauel, Christoph
cristin.unitcode185,16,17,55
cristin.unitnameKjeveortopedi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode0
dc.identifier.cristin1535396
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Progress in Orthodontics&rft.volume=18&rft.spage=&rft.date=2017
dc.identifier.jtitleProgress in Orthodontics
dc.identifier.volume18
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-017-0161-5
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-64995
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1723-7785
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/62420/1/Papageorgiou%2BS.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International