Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2018-07-10T07:08:22Z
dc.date.available2018-07-10T07:08:22Z
dc.date.created2017-11-15T13:24:00Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationVagnildhaug, Ola Magne Blum, David Wilcock, Andrew Fayers, Peter Strasser, Florian Baracos, Vickie E. Hjermstad, Marianne Jensen Kaasa, Stein Laird, Barry J Solheim, Tora Skeidsvoll . The applicability of a weight loss grading system in cancer cachexia: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle. 2017, 8(5), 789-797
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/62170
dc.description.abstractBackground: A body mass index (BMI) adjusted weight loss grading system (WLGS) is related to survival in patients with cancer. The aim of this study was to examine the applicability of the WLGS by confirming its prognostic validity, evaluating its relationship to cachexia domains, and exploring its ability to predict cachexia progression. Methods: An international, prospective observational study of patients with incurable cancer was conducted. For each patient, weight loss grade was scored 0–4. Weight loss grade 0 represents a high BMI with limited weight loss, progressing through to weight loss grade 4 representing low BMI and a high degree of weight loss. Survival analyses were used to confirm prognostic validity. Analyses of variance were used to evaluate the relationship between the WLGS and cachexia domains [anorexia, dietary intake, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and physical and emotional functioning]. Cox regression was used to evaluate if the addition of cachexia domains to the WLGS improved prognostic accuracy. Predictive ability of cachexia progression was assessed by estimating proportion of patients progressing to a more advanced weight loss grade. Results: One thousand four hundred six patients were analysed (median age 66 years; 50% female, 63% KPS ≤ 70). The overall effect of the WLGS on survival was significant as expressed by change in −2 log likelihood (P < 0.001) and persisted after adjustment for age, sex, and cancer type and stage (P < 0.001). Median survival decreased across the weight loss grades ranging from 407 days (95% CI 312–502)—weight loss grade 0 to 119 days (95% CI 93–145)—weight loss grade 4. All cachexia domains significantly deteriorated with increasing weight loss grade, and deterioration was greatest for dietary intake, with a difference corresponding to 0.87 standard deviations between weight loss grades 0 and 4. The addition of KPS, anorexia, and physical and emotional functioning improved the prognostic accuracy of the WLGS. Likelihood of cachexia progression was greater in patients with weight loss grade 2 (39%) than that with weight loss grade 0 (19%) or 1 (22%). Conclusions: The WLGS is related to survival, cachexia domains, and the likelihood of progression. Adding certain cachexia domains to the WLGS improves prognostic accuracy.en_US
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleThe applicability of a weight loss grading system in cancer cachexia: a longitudinal analysisen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.creator.authorVagnildhaug, Ola Magne
dc.creator.authorBlum, David
dc.creator.authorWilcock, Andrew
dc.creator.authorFayers, Peter
dc.creator.authorStrasser, Florian
dc.creator.authorBaracos, Vickie E.
dc.creator.authorHjermstad, Marianne Jensen
dc.creator.authorKaasa, Stein
dc.creator.authorLaird, Barry J
dc.creator.authorSolheim, Tora Skeidsvoll
cristin.unitcode185,53,49,10
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for kreftbehandling
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1514407
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle&rft.volume=8&rft.spage=789&rft.date=2017
dc.identifier.jtitleJournal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
dc.identifier.volume8
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.startpage789
dc.identifier.endpage797
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12220
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-64763
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2190-5991
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/62170/1/jcsm12220.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
dc.relation.project90062500


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International