Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2018-03-27T14:50:24Z
dc.date.available2018-03-27T14:50:24Z
dc.date.created2017-02-17T13:00:12Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationHolme, Øyvind Schoen, Robert E. Senore, Carlo Segnan, Nereo Hoff, Geir Løberg, Magnus Bretthauer, Michael Adami, Hans Olov Kalager, Mette . Effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in men and women and different age groups: Pooled analysis of randomised trials. BMJ (Clinical Research Edition). 2017, 356
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/61336
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer by patient sex and age. Design: Pooled analysis of randomised trials (the US Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian cancer screening trial (PLCO), the Italian Screening for Colon and Rectum trial (SCORE), and the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention trial (NORCCAP)). Data sources: Aggregated data were pooled from each randomised trial on incidence of colorectal cancer and mortality stratified by sex, age at screening, and colon subsite (distal v proximal). Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Invited individuals aged 55-74 (PLCO), 55-64 (SCORE), and 50-64 (NORCCAP). Individuals were randomised to receive flexible sigmoidoscopy screening once only (SCORE and NORCCAP) or twice (PLCO), or receive usual care (no intervention). Results: 287 928 individuals were included in the pooled analysis; 115 139 randomised to screening and 172 789 to usual care. Compliance rates were 58%, 63%, and 87% in SCORE, NORCCAP, and PLCO, respectively. Median follow-up was 10.5 to 12.1 years. Screening reduced the incidence of colorectal cancer in men (relative risk 0.76; 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 0.83) and women (0.83; 0.75 to 0.92). No difference in the effect of screening was seen between men younger than 60 and those older than 60. Screening reduced the incidence of colorectal cancer in women younger than 60 (relative risk 0.71; 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.84), but not significantly in those aged 60 or older (0.90; 0.80 to 1.02). Colorectal cancer mortality was significantly reduced in both younger and older men, and in women younger than 60. Screening reduced colorectal cancer incidence to a similar extent in the distal colon in men and women, but there was no effect of screening in the proximal colon in older women with a significant interaction between sex and age group (P=0.04). Conclusion: Flexible sigmoidoscopy is an effective tool for colorectal cancer screening in men and younger women. The benefit is smaller and not statistically significant for women aged over 60; alternative screening methods that more effectively detect proximal tumours should be considered for these women.en_US
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
dc.titleEffectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in men and women and different age groups: Pooled analysis of randomised trialsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.creator.authorHolme, Øyvind
dc.creator.authorSchoen, Robert E.
dc.creator.authorSenore, Carlo
dc.creator.authorSegnan, Nereo
dc.creator.authorHoff, Geir
dc.creator.authorLøberg, Magnus
dc.creator.authorBretthauer, Michael
dc.creator.authorAdami, Hans Olov
dc.creator.authorKalager, Mette
cristin.unitcode185,52,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for helse og samfunn
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1451669
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=BMJ (Clinical Research Edition)&rft.volume=356&rft.spage=&rft.date=2017
dc.identifier.jtitleBMJ (Clinical Research Edition)
dc.identifier.volume356
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6673
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-63951
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0959-8138
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/61336/1/BMJ%2B2017_Flex%2Bsig%2Bmeta%2Banalysis.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported
This item's license is: Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported