dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-23T14:06:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-02-23T14:06:46Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-01-09T13:18:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Speyer, Renee Denman, D Wilkes-Gillan, S Chen, Y-W Bogaardt, HCA Kim, J-K Heckathorn, D Cordier, R . The effects of telehealth by allied health professionals and nursing in rural and remote areas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2018, 50 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10852/60372 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To describe telehealth interventions delivered by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas, and to compare the effects of telehealth interventions with standard face-to-face interventions.
Data sources: CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO and PubMed databases were searched. The content of relevant journals and published articles were also searched.
Study selection: Studies examining the effectiveness of allied health and nursing telehealth interventions for rural and remote populations were included in descriptive analyses. Studies comparing telehealth intervention with standard face-to-face interventions grouped by type of intervention approach were used to examine between-groups effect sizes.
Data extraction: Methodological quality of studies was rated using the QualSyst critical appraisal tool and the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Evidence Hierarchy levels.
Data synthesis: After quality ratings, 43 studies were included. A majority of studies had strong methodological quality. The disciplines of psychology and nursing were represented most frequently, as were studies using a cognitive intervention approach. Meta-analysis results slightly favoured telehealth interventions compared with face-to-face interventions, but did not show significant differences. Interventions using a combined physical and cognitive approach appeared to be more effective.
Conclusion: Telehealth services may be as effective as face-to-face interventions, which is encouraging given the potential benefits of telehealth in rural and remote areas with regards to healthcare access and time and cost savings. | en_US |
dc.language | EN | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | |
dc.title | The effects of telehealth by allied health professionals and nursing in rural and remote areas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.creator.author | Speyer, Renee | |
dc.creator.author | Denman, D | |
dc.creator.author | Wilkes-Gillan, S | |
dc.creator.author | Chen, Y-W | |
dc.creator.author | Bogaardt, HCA | |
dc.creator.author | Kim, J-K | |
dc.creator.author | Heckathorn, D | |
dc.creator.author | Cordier, R | |
cristin.unitcode | 185,18,3,0 | |
cristin.unitname | Institutt for spesialpedagogikk | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1538783 | |
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitation | info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine&rft.volume=50&rft.spage=&rft.date=2018 | |
dc.identifier.jtitle | Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine | |
dc.identifier.volume | 50 | |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2297 | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:no-63008 | |
dc.type.document | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type.peerreviewed | Peer reviewed | |
dc.source.issn | 1650-1977 | |
dc.identifier.fulltext | Fulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/60372/2/SpeyerEtAl_Telehealth_2017.pdf | |
dc.type.version | PublishedVersion | |