Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2018-02-13T11:23:57Z
dc.date.available2018-02-13T11:23:57Z
dc.date.created2018-01-08T14:20:35Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationDurgonics, T Komjathy, A Verkhoglyadova, O Shume, EB von Benzon, H-H Mannucci, AJ Butala, MD Høeg, P Langley, RB . Multiinstrument observations of a geomagnetic storm and its effects on the Arctic ionosphere: A case study of the 19 February 2014 storm. Radio Science. 2017, 52, 146-165
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/60055
dc.description.abstractWe present a multiinstrumented approach for the analysis of the Arctic ionosphere during the 19 February 2014 highly complex, multiphase geomagnetic storm, which had the largest impact on the disturbance storm-time index that year. The geomagnetic storm was the result of two powerful Earth-directed coronal mass ejections (CMEs). It produced a strong long lasting negative storm phase over Greenland with a dominant energy input in the polar cap. We employed global navigation satellite system (GNSS) networks, geomagnetic observatories, and a specific ionosonde station in Greenland. We complemented the approach with spaceborne measurements in order to map the state and variability of the Arctic ionosphere. In situ observations from the Canadian CASSIOPE (CAScade, Smallsat and IOnospheric Polar Explorer) satellite's ion mass spectrometer were used to derive ion flow data from the polar cap topside ionosphere during the event. Our research specifically found that (1) thermospheric O/N2 measurements demonstrated significantly lower values over the Greenland sector than prior to the storm time. (2) An increased ion flow in the topside ionosphere was observed during the negative storm phase. (3) Negative storm phase was a direct consequence of energy input into the polar cap. (4) Polar patch formation was significantly decreased during the negative storm phase. This paper addresses the physical processes that can be responsible for this ionospheric storm development in the northern high latitudes. We conclude that ionospheric heating due to the CME's energy input caused changes in the polar atmosphere resulting in Ne upwelling, which was the major factor in high-latitude ionosphere dynamics for this storm. This research was originally published in Radio Science. © 2017 Wileyen_US
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union
dc.titleMultiinstrument observations of a geomagnetic storm and its effects on the Arctic ionosphere: A case study of the 19 February 2014 stormen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.creator.authorDurgonics, T
dc.creator.authorKomjathy, A
dc.creator.authorVerkhoglyadova, O
dc.creator.authorShume, EB
dc.creator.authorvon Benzon, H-H
dc.creator.authorMannucci, AJ
dc.creator.authorButala, MD
dc.creator.authorHøeg, P
dc.creator.authorLangley, RB
cristin.unitcode185,15,4,70
cristin.unitnamePlasma- og romfysikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1537852
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Radio Science&rft.volume=52&rft.spage=146&rft.date=2017
dc.identifier.jtitleRadio Science
dc.identifier.volume52
dc.identifier.startpage146
dc.identifier.endpage165
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016RS006106
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-62734
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0048-6604
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/60055/2/Radio_Science_Durgonics_Jan2017.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata