Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2018-02-01T11:25:53Z
dc.date.available2018-02-01T11:25:53Z
dc.date.created2015-09-20T18:49:53Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationKravitz, Ben Forster, Piers M. Jones, Andy Robock, Alan Alterskjaer, Kari Boucher, Olivier Jenkins, Annabel K. L. Korhonen, Hannele Kristjansson, Jon Egill Muri, Helene Niemeier, Ulrike Partanen, Antti-Ilari Rasch, Philip J. Wang, Hailong Watanabe, Shingo . Sea spray geoengineering experiments in the geoengineering model intercomparison project (GeoMIP): Experimental design and preliminary results. Journal of Geophysical Research - Atmospheres. 2013, 118, 11,175-11,186
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/59817
dc.description.abstract[1] Marine cloud brightening through sea spray injection has been proposed as a method of temporarily alleviating some of the impacts of anthropogenic climate change, as part of a set of technologies called geoengineering. We outline here a proposal for three coordinated climate modeling experiments to test aspects of sea spray geoengineering, to be conducted under the auspices of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). The first, highly idealized, experiment (G1ocean-albedo) involves a uniform increase in ocean albedo to offset an instantaneous quadrupling of CO2 concentrations from preindustrial levels. Results from a single climate model show an increased land-sea temperature contrast, Arctic warming, and large shifts in annual mean precipitation patterns. The second experiment (G4cdnc) involves increasing cloud droplet number concentration in all low-level marine clouds to offset some of the radiative forcing of an RCP4.5 scenario. This experiment will test the robustness of models in simulating geographically heterogeneous radiative flux changes and their effects on climate. The third experiment (G4sea-salt) involves injection of sea spray aerosols into the marine boundary layer between 30°S and 30°N to offset 2 W m−2 of the effective radiative forcing of an RCP4.5 scenario. A single model study shows that the induced effective radiative forcing is largely confined to the latitudes in which injection occurs. In this single model simulation, the forcing due to aerosol-radiation interactions is stronger than the forcing due to aerosol-cloud interactions.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)
dc.titleSea spray geoengineering experiments in the geoengineering model intercomparison project (GeoMIP): Experimental design and preliminary results
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorKravitz, Ben
dc.creator.authorForster, Piers M.
dc.creator.authorJones, Andy
dc.creator.authorRobock, Alan
dc.creator.authorAlterskjaer, Kari
dc.creator.authorBoucher, Olivier
dc.creator.authorJenkins, Annabel K. L.
dc.creator.authorKorhonen, Hannele
dc.creator.authorKristjansson, Jon Egill
dc.creator.authorMuri, Helene
dc.creator.authorNiemeier, Ulrike
dc.creator.authorPartanen, Antti-Ilari
dc.creator.authorRasch, Philip J.
dc.creator.authorWang, Hailong
dc.creator.authorWatanabe, Shingo
cristin.unitcode185,15,22,70
cristin.unitnameMeteorologi og oseanografi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.cristin1265802
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal of Geophysical Research - Atmospheres&rft.volume=118&rft.spage=11,175&rft.date=2013
dc.identifier.jtitleJournal of Geophysical Research - Atmospheres
dc.identifier.volume118
dc.identifier.startpage11,175
dc.identifier.endpage11,186
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50856
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-62502
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2169-897X
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/59817/1/Kravitz_Muri_etal_2013_jgrd50856.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
dc.relation.projectNFR/207711
dc.relation.projectEU/306395


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata