Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2018-02-01T10:03:50Z
dc.date.available2018-02-01T10:03:50Z
dc.date.created2014-03-14T16:31:51Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationCurry, Charles L. Sillmann, Jana Bronaugh, David Alterskjær, Kari Cole, Jason N.S. Ji, Duoying Kravitz, Ben Kristjansson, Jon Egill Moore, John C. Muri, Helene Østlie Niemeier, Ulrike Robock, Alan Tilmes, Simone Yang, Shuting . A multimodel examination of climate Extremes in an idealized geoengineering experiment. Journal of Geophysical Research - Atmospheres. 2014, 119(7), 3900-3923
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/59807
dc.description.abstractTemperature and precipitation extremes are examined in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project experiment G1, wherein an instantaneous quadrupling of CO2 from its preindustrial control value is offset by a commensurate reduction in solar irradiance. Compared to the preindustrial climate, changes in climate extremes under G1 are generally much smaller than under 4 × CO2 alone. However, it is also the case that extremes of temperature and precipitation in G1 differ significantly from those under preindustrial conditions. Probability density functions of standardized anomalies of monthly surface temperature and precipitation in G1 exhibit an extension of the high- tail over land, of the low- tail over ocean, and a shift of to drier conditions. Using daily model output, we analyzed the frequency of extreme events, such as the coldest night (TNn), warmest day (TXx), and maximum 5 day precipitation amount, and also duration indicators such as cold and warm spells and consecutive dry days. The strong heating at northern high latitudes simulated under 4 × CO2 is much alleviated in G1, but significant warming remains, particularly for TNn compared to TXx. Internal feedbacks lead to regional increases in absorbed solar radiation at the surface, increasing temperatures over Northern Hemisphere land in summer. Conversely, significant cooling occurs over the tropical oceans, increasing cold spell duration there. Globally, G1 is more effective in reducing changes in temperature extremes compared to precipitation extremes and for reducing changes in precipitation extremes versus means but somewhat less effective at reducing changes in temperature extremes compared to means.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)
dc.titleA multimodel examination of climate Extremes in an idealized geoengineering experiment
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorCurry, Charles L.
dc.creator.authorSillmann, Jana
dc.creator.authorBronaugh, David
dc.creator.authorAlterskjær, Kari
dc.creator.authorCole, Jason N.S.
dc.creator.authorJi, Duoying
dc.creator.authorKravitz, Ben
dc.creator.authorKristjansson, Jon Egill
dc.creator.authorMoore, John C.
dc.creator.authorMuri, Helene Østlie
dc.creator.authorNiemeier, Ulrike
dc.creator.authorRobock, Alan
dc.creator.authorTilmes, Simone
dc.creator.authorYang, Shuting
cristin.unitcode185,15,22,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for geofag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.cristin1122270
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal of Geophysical Research - Atmospheres&rft.volume=119&rft.spage=3900&rft.date=2014
dc.identifier.jtitleJournal of Geophysical Research - Atmospheres
dc.identifier.volume119
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.startpage3900
dc.identifier.endpage3923
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020648
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-62499
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2169-897X
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/59807/2/Curry_et_al-2014-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Atmospheres.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
dc.relation.projectNFR/207711
dc.relation.projectNFR/184714


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata