Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2017-10-27T07:31:41Z
dc.date.available2017-10-27T07:31:41Z
dc.date.created2017-10-05T14:08:19Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationBurkhart, John Kylling, Arve Schaaf, Crystal B. Wang, Zhuosen Bogren, Wiley Steven Storvold, Rune Solbø, Stian Pedersen, Christina Alsvik Gerland, Sebastian . Unmanned aerial system nadir reflectance and MODIS nadir BRDF-adjusted surface reflectances intercompared over Greenland. The Cryosphere. 2017, 11(4), 1575-1589
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/58975
dc.description.abstractAlbedo is a fundamental parameter in earth sciences, and many analyses utilize the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF)/albedo (MCD43) algorithms. While derivative albedo products have been evaluated over Greenland, we present a novel, direct comparison with nadir surface reflectance collected from an unmanned aerial system (UAS). The UAS was flown from Summit, Greenland, on 210 km transects coincident with the MODIS sensor overpass on board the Aqua and Terra satellites on 5 and 6 August 2010. Clear-sky acquisitions were available from the overpasses within 2 h of the UAS flights. The UAS was equipped with upward- and downward-looking spectrometers (300–920 nm) with a spectral resolution of 10 nm, allowing for direct integration into the MODIS bands 1, 3, and 4. The data provide a unique opportunity to directly compare UAS nadir reflectance with the MODIS nadir BRDF-adjusted surface reflectance (NBAR) products. The data show UAS measurements are slightly higher than the MODIS NBARs for all bands but agree within their stated uncertainties. Differences in variability are observed as expected due to different footprints of the platforms. The UAS data demonstrate potentially large sub-pixel variability of MODIS reflectance products and the potential to explore this variability using the UAS as a platform. It is also found that, even at the low elevations flown typically by a UAS, reflectance measurements may be influenced by haze if present at and/or below the flight altitude of the UAS. This impact could explain some differences between data from the two platforms and should be considered in any use of airborne platforms.en_US
dc.languageEN
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNational Snow and Ice Data Center
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
dc.titleUnmanned aerial system nadir reflectance and MODIS nadir BRDF-adjusted surface reflectances intercompared over Greenlanden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.creator.authorBurkhart, John
dc.creator.authorKylling, Arve
dc.creator.authorSchaaf, Crystal B.
dc.creator.authorWang, Zhuosen
dc.creator.authorBogren, Wiley Steven
dc.creator.authorStorvold, Rune
dc.creator.authorSolbø, Stian
dc.creator.authorPedersen, Christina Alsvik
dc.creator.authorGerland, Sebastian
cristin.unitcode185,15,22,60
cristin.unitnameSeksjon for naturgeografi og hydrologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.cristin1502559
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=The Cryosphere&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=1575&rft.date=2017
dc.identifier.jtitleThe Cryosphere
dc.identifier.volume11
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage1575
dc.identifier.endpage1589
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-1575-2017
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-61495
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1994-0416
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/58975/1/tc-11-1575-2017.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 3.0 Unported
This item's license is: Attribution 3.0 Unported