dc.contributor.author | Nielsen, Mats Andreas | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-21T22:27:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-09-21T22:27:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Nielsen, Mats Andreas. What makes us who we are: On the relationship between human existence and technics, thinking and technology, and the philosopher and the technician. Master thesis, University of Oslo, 2017 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10852/58411 | |
dc.description.abstract | | eng |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis conceptually investigates the relationship between human existence and the technical object, and thereby relates questions faced within the philosophy of technology to the field of philosophical anthropology. This conceptual work will be taken up in a twofold manner. Firstly, I detail how the Western philosophical tradition has tended to distance its own practice and thinking from the technical, and how it, relatedly, has hierarchically subjugated technics from what essentially defines us as human beings. This will involve a genealogical investigation of the figure of the philosopher and the technician, which will detail how and why these figures have been antagonistic and oppositional from the start. The argument being that this relationship constitutes a genuine hindrance for thinking of existence as originarily technical within the confines of traditional philosophical inquiry and its various schools of thought. Secondly, I conceptually investigate and phenomenologically describe the relationship between human existence and technics by way of an engagement with, first and foremost, the early and late thought of the German philosopher Martin Heidegger, the work of the French palaeoanthropologist André Leroi-Gourhan and the thought of the contemporary French philosopher Bernard Stiegler. The thesis sets out to question, in this regard, whether or not tool-user and tool, the human and the technical object are originarily prosthetically coupled, and hence if, so to speak, the inventor is also invented with what it invents. Its argument being, in this connection, that the invention of the human is technics. The central thesis of Heidegger’s later philosophy of technology that the essence of technics is by no means anything technical will thus be called into question. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.subject | smartphone | |
dc.subject | archaeology of reflexivity | |
dc.subject | technical object | |
dc.subject | Gesture and Speech | |
dc.subject | technological break | |
dc.subject | Prometheus | |
dc.subject | palaeontology | |
dc.subject | technical memory | |
dc.subject | technogenesis | |
dc.subject | radio | |
dc.subject | German philosophy | |
dc.subject | postphenomenology | |
dc.subject | Gilbert Simondon | |
dc.subject | Væren og Tid | |
dc.subject | teknologi | |
dc.subject | French philosophy | |
dc.subject | post-phenomenology | |
dc.subject | Plato | |
dc.subject | Mats Andreas Nielsen | |
dc.subject | Being and Time | |
dc.subject | engineering philosophy of technology | |
dc.subject | humanities philosophy of technology | |
dc.subject | anthropology | |
dc.subject | teknikk og tid | |
dc.subject | typewriter | |
dc.subject | Pierre Ducassé | |
dc.subject | Continental philosophy | |
dc.subject | technicity | |
dc.subject | teknisk objekt | |
dc.subject | hermeneutics | |
dc.subject | postfenomenologi | |
dc.subject | teknikk | |
dc.subject | media archaeology | |
dc.subject | being in the world | |
dc.subject | technics | |
dc.subject | Wolfgang Ernst | |
dc.subject | Ernst Kapp | |
dc.subject | palaeoanthropology | |
dc.subject | touchscreen smartphone | |
dc.subject | existential analytic | |
dc.subject | dasein | |
dc.subject | fenomenologi | |
dc.subject | technics and time | |
dc.subject | originary technicity | |
dc.subject | medieestetikk | |
dc.subject | André Leroi-Gourhan | |
dc.subject | philosophical anthropology | |
dc.subject | phenomenology | |
dc.subject | Sein und Zeit | |
dc.subject | technical evolution | |
dc.subject | existentialism | |
dc.subject | prosthetics | |
dc.subject | Bernard Stiegler | |
dc.subject | eksistential analyse | |
dc.subject | media aesthetics | |
dc.subject | anthropogenesis | |
dc.subject | Aristotle | |
dc.subject | what makes us who we are | |
dc.subject | Don Ihde | |
dc.subject | the hand | |
dc.subject | the philosophy of technology | |
dc.subject | technician | |
dc.subject | epiphylogenesis | |
dc.subject | Martin Heidegger | |
dc.subject | technology | |
dc.subject | teknologifilosofi | |
dc.subject | Epimetheus | |
dc.subject | exteriorization | |
dc.subject | tekhne | |
dc.subject | filosofisk antropologi | |
dc.subject | kontinentalfilosofi | |
dc.subject | default of origin | |
dc.subject | the invention of the human | |
dc.subject | techne | |
dc.subject | French philosophy of technology | |
dc.title | What makes us who we are: On the relationship between human existence and technics, thinking and technology, and the philosopher and the technician | eng |
dc.type | Master thesis | |
dc.date.updated | 2017-09-21T22:27:57Z | |
dc.creator.author | Nielsen, Mats Andreas | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:no-61118 | |
dc.type.document | Masteroppgave | |
dc.identifier.fulltext | Fulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/58411/1/Master-Andreas-Nielsen-Master-thesis.pdf | |