Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2017-01-11T10:04:33Z
dc.date.available2017-01-11T10:04:33Z
dc.date.created2016-11-30T14:15:03Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationPedersen, Anne Tiril Myhre Nowak, Michael Brysting, Anne Krag Elven, Reidar Bjora, Charlotte S . Hybrid origins of carex rostrata var. borealis and C. stenolepis, two problematic taxa in carex section vesicariae (cyperaceae). PLoS ONE. 2016, 11(10)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/53508
dc.description.abstractHybridization is frequent in the large and ecologically significant genus Carex (Cyperaceae). In four important sections of the northern regions (Ceratocystis, Glareosae, Phacocystis and Vesicariae), the frequent occurrence of hybrids often renders the identification of “pure” species and hybrids difficult. In this study we address the origins and taxonomic rank of two taxa of section Vesicariae: Carex rostrata var. borealis and C. stenolepis. The origin and taxonomic status of C. stenolepis has been the subject of substantial debate over the years, whereas C. rostrata var. borealis has received very little attention in the years since its first description in the 19th century. By performing an extensive sampling of relevant taxa from a broad distribution range, and analyzing data from fifteen microsatellite loci developed specifically for our study together with pollen stainability measures, we resolve the hybrid origins of C. rostrata var. borealis and C. stenolepis and provide new insights into this taxonomically challenging group of sedges. Our results are in accordance with previous findings suggesting that C. stenolepis is a hybrid between C. vesicaria and C. saxatilis. They are also in accordance with a previous proposition that C. rostrata var. borealis is a hybrid between C. rostrata and C. rotundata, and furthermore suggest that both hybrids are the result of multiple, recent (i.e., postglacial) hybridization events. We found little evidence for successful sexual reproduction within C. rostrata var. borealis and C. stenolepis, but conclude that the common and recurrent, largely predictable occurrence of these taxa justifies accepting both hybrids as hybrid species with binomial names. There are, however, complications as to types and priority names, and we therefore choose to address these problems in a separate paper.en_US
dc.languageEN
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleHybrid origins of carex rostrata var. borealis and C. stenolepis, two problematic taxa in carex section vesicariae (cyperaceae)en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.creator.authorPedersen, Anne Tiril Myhre
dc.creator.authorNowak, Michael
dc.creator.authorBrysting, Anne Krag
dc.creator.authorElven, Reidar
dc.creator.authorBjora, Charlotte S
cristin.unitcode185,28,0,0
cristin.unitnameNaturhistorisk museum
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1406551
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=PLoS ONE&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=&rft.date=2016
dc.identifier.jtitlePLoS ONE
dc.identifier.volume11
dc.identifier.issue10
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165430
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-56703
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/53508/1/journal-pone-0165430-pedersen.PDF
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleide0165430


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International