Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2016-09-14T13:47:41Z
dc.date.available2016-09-14T13:47:41Z
dc.date.created2016-09-07T10:38:49Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationLenferink, Anke Effing, Tanja Harvey, Peter Battersby, Malcolm Frith, Peter van Beurden, Wendy van der Palen, Job Paap, Muirne C. S. . Construct Validity of the Dutch Version of the 12-Item Partners in Health Scale: Measuring Patient Self-Management Behaviour and Knowledge in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. PLoS ONE. 2016
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/52517
dc.description.abstractObjective The 12-item Partners in Health scale (PIH) was developed in Australia to measure self-management behaviour and knowledge in patients with chronic diseases, and has undergone several changes. Our aim was to assess the construct validity and reliability of the latest PIH version in Dutch COPD patients. Methods The 12 items of the PIH, scored on a self-rated 9-point Likert scale, are used to calculate total and subscale scores (knowledge; coping; recognition and management of symptoms; and adherence to treatment). We used forward-backward translation of the latest version of the Australian PIH to define a Dutch PIH (PIH(Du)). Mokken Scale Analysis and common Factor Analysis were performed on data from a Dutch COPD sample to investigate the psychometric properties of the Dutch PIH; and to determine whether the four-subscale solution previously found for the original Australian PIH could be replicated for the Dutch PIH. Results Two subscales were found for the Dutch PIH data (n = 118); 1) knowledge and coping; 2) recognition and management of symptoms, adherence to treatment. The correlation between the two Dutch subscales was 0.43. The lower-bound of the reliability of the total scale equalled 0.84. Factor analysis indicated that the first two factors explained a larger percentage of common variance (39.4% and 19.9%) than could be expected when using random data (17.5% and 15.1%). Conclusion We recommend using two PIH subscale scores when assessing self-management in Dutch COPD patients. Our results did not support the four-subscale structure as previously reported for the original Australian PIH.en_US
dc.languageEN
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleConstruct Validity of the Dutch Version of the 12-Item Partners in Health Scale: Measuring Patient Self-Management Behaviour and Knowledge in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseaseen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.creator.authorLenferink, Anke
dc.creator.authorEffing, Tanja
dc.creator.authorHarvey, Peter
dc.creator.authorBattersby, Malcolm
dc.creator.authorFrith, Peter
dc.creator.authorvan Beurden, Wendy
dc.creator.authorvan der Palen, Job
dc.creator.authorPaap, Muirne C. S.
cristin.unitcode185,18,7,0
cristin.unitnameCentre for Educational Measurement
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1378875
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=PLoS ONE&rft.volume=&rft.spage=&rft.date=2016
dc.identifier.jtitlePLoS ONE
dc.identifier.volume11
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161595
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-55918
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/52517/1/ankelenferink_PIH.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleide0161595


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International