Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2016-08-31T10:44:48Z
dc.date.available2016-08-31T10:44:48Z
dc.date.created2016-08-12T11:57:18Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/51871
dc.description.abstractAbdominal wall hernia is a major health burden, especially as secondary to surgical therapy. Incisional hernia occurs in 10- 20 % of laparotomy scars and parastomal hernia occurs in more than 50% of patients with end colostomy. Parastomal hernia repair has a high failure rate. Modern hernia repair includes the use of tissue support with mesh, but in some patient categories this is still circumvented in fear of mesh infection, e.g. potentially contaminated wounds and immunosuppressed patients - and in small spontaneous hernia. Mesh in incisional hernia prophylaxis is a novel concept and not widely implemented. In this thesis the aims were to assess the efficacy of laparoscopic hernia repair and compare the results of an incisional hernia cohort to a spontaneous hernia cohort as well as a cohort with incisional hernia after liver or kidney transplantation. Additionally, to assess the efficacy of parastomal hernia prevention by synthetic mesh prophylaxis in end colostomy creation. The laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall hernia with implantation of a synthetic intraperitoneal mesh was safe and effective in all patient categories. In immunosuppressed patients the risk of wound and mesh infection is very minor in contrast to the open repair method. The hernia recurrence rate was higher (10%)in the transplanted cohort that also had the largest hernias. The use of absorbable suture to close the defect before mesh reinforcement – as opposed to bridging the defect – did not improve outcomes. Implantation of a synthetic mesh at the stoma site in end colostomy creation more than halved the risk of parastomal hernia (hazard ratio 0.09; confidence interval 0.02-0.44). The aperture in the abdominal wall is stabile when using mesh protection compared to a significant enlargement in non-protected apertures. Mesh implantation did not affect adverse events. Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia in transplanted patients is favorable and use of mesh in stoma creation prevents hernia.
dc.languageEN
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisher07 Gruppen
dc.relation.haspartPaper 1 Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: outcomes in primary versus incisional hernias: no effect of defect closure. Lambrecht JR, Vaktskjold A, Trondsen E, Øyen OM, Reiertsen O. Hernia. 2015 Jun;19(3):479-86. The paper is not available in DUO due to publisher restrictions. The published version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1345-x
dc.relation.haspartPaper 2 Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia in solid organ-transplanted patients: the method of choice? Lambrecht JR, Skauby M, Trondsen E, Vaktskjold A, Øyen OM. Transpl Int. 2014 Jul;27(7):712-20. The paper is not available in DUO due to publisher restrictions. The published version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.12327
dc.relation.haspartPaper 3 Prophylactic mesh at end-colostomy construction reduces parastomal hernia rate: a randomized trial. Lambrecht JR, Larsen SG, Reiertsen O, Vaktskjold A, Julsrud L, Flatmark K. Colorectal Dis. 2015 Oct;17(10):O191-7. The paper is available in DUO: http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-54734
dc.relation.haspartAccessory publication 1 Overlap-coefficient for the relationship between mesh size and defect size in laparoscopic ventral hernia surgery. Lambrecht J. Hernia. 2011 Aug;15(4):473-4. The paper is not available in DUO due to publisher restrictions. The published version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0817-x
dc.relation.haspartAccessory publication 2 Invited commentary to letter by Jan Lambrecht. Amid PK. Hernia. 2011 Aug;15:475. The paper is not available in DUO due to publisher restrictions. The published version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0818-9
dc.relation.haspartAccessory publication 3 Authors response to comment of Prof. Dr. Amid on original article “Overlap-coefficient for the relationship between mesh size and defect size in ventral hernia surgery” The paper is not available in DUO due to publisher restrictions. The published version is available at: Lambrecht J. Hernia. 2011, 15:479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0835-8
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1345-x
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.12327
dc.relation.urihttp://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-54734
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0817-x
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0818-9
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0835-8
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0819-8
dc.titleAnterior abdominal wall hernia in adults - Clinical studies on treatment and preventionen_US
dc.title.alternativeNBNorsk, bokmålNorwegian, bokmålForebyggelse av stomibrokk og kirurgisk behandling av brokk i bukveggen
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen_US
dc.creator.authorLambrecht, Jan Roland
cristin.unitcode185,50,0,0
cristin.unitnameDet medisinske fakultet
cristin.ispublishedfalse
cristin.fulltextoriginal
dc.identifier.cristin1372366
dc.identifier.pagecount142
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-55292
dc.type.documentDoktoravhandlingen_US
dc.source.isbn978-82-8333-242-1
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/51871/5/PhD-Lambrecht-DUO.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata