Now showing items 1-6 of 6

  • Holst, Cathrine; Molander, Anders (Journal article / Tidsskriftartikkel / AcceptedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2018)
    This paper contributes to an on-going exchange in political theory on the normative legitimacy of expert bodies. It focuses on epistemic worries about the expertisation of politics, and uses the Nordic system of advisory ...
  • Holst, Cathrine; Molander, Anders (Journal article / Tidsskriftartikkel / AcceptedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2019)
    Epistemic democrats are rightly concerned with the quality of outcomes and judge democratic procedures in terms of their ability to ‘track the truth’. However, their impetus to assess ‘rule by experts’ and ‘rule by the ...
  • Holst, Cathrine; Molander, Anders (Journal article / Tidsskriftartikkel / AcceptedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2019)
    Epistemic democrats are rightly concerned with the quality of outcomes and judge democratic procedures in terms of their ability to ‘track the truth’. However, their impetus to assess ‘rule by experts’ and ‘rule by the ...
  • Holst, Cathrine; Molander, Anders (Chapter / Bokkapittel / AcceptedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2019)
  • Molander, Anders; Holst, Cathrine (Chapter / Bokkapittel / PublishedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2009)
  • Holst, Cathrine; Molander, Anders (Journal article / Tidsskriftartikkel / AcceptedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2017)
    This paper discusses the conditions for legitimate expert arrangements within a democratic order and from a deliberative systems approach. It is argued that standard objections against the political role of experts are ...