Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2014-08-18T11:40:28Z
dc.date.available2014-08-18T11:40:28Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/39893
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.haspartPaper I Patient doses from screen-film and full-field digital mammography in a population based screening programme Hauge IH, Pedersen K, Sanderud A, Hofvind S, Olerud HM. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, January 2012, Vol. 148, No. 1, pp. 65–73. Published online before print 17 February 2011. The paper is removed from the thesis in DUO due to publisher restrictions. The published version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncq598
dc.relation.haspartPaper II The readout thickness versus the measured thickness for a range of screen film mammography (SFM) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) units Hauge IH, Hogg P, Szczepura K, Connolly P, McGill G, Mercer C. Medical Physics, January 2012, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 263-271. The paper is removed from the thesis in DUO due to publisher restrictions. The published version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3663579
dc.relation.haspartPaper III Uncertainties involved in the estimation of mean glandular dose for women in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) Hauge IH, Olerud HM. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, June 2013, Vol. 155, No. 1, pp. 81-87. Published online before print 27 November 2012. The paper is removed from the thesis in DUO due to publisher restrictions. The published version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs314
dc.relation.haspartPaper IV New diagnostic reference level for full-field digital mammography (FFDM) units Hauge IH, Bredholt K, Olerud HM. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, December 2013, Vol. 157, No. 2, pp. 181–192. Published online before print 14 June 2013. The paper is removed from the thesis in DUO due to publisher restrictions. The published version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nct136
dc.relation.haspartPaper V The risk of radiation-induced breast cancers due to biennial mammographic screening in women aged 50-69 years is minimal Hauge IH, Pedersen K, Olerud HM, Hole EO, Hofvind S. Accepted version, published in: Acta Radiologica, published online before print 5 December 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0284185113514051
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncq598
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3663579
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs314
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nct136
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0284185113514051
dc.titleTechnical quality control in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program with focus on radiation dosesen_US
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen_US
dc.creator.authorHauge, Ingrid Helen Ryste
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-44661
dc.type.documentDoktoravhandlingen_US
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/39893/1/dravhandling-hauge-DUO.pdf


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata