dc.date.accessioned | 2013-03-12T13:25:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-03-12T13:25:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | en_US |
dc.date.submitted | 2002-11-19 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10852/32770 | |
dc.description.abstract | There is a concern in many countries that a domestic tradable quota system for greenhouse gases, where all emitters must pay for their quotas, may lead to closures of emissions-intensive industrial companies. Allocating quotas free of charge to companies operating in competitive markets has been suggested as a means to reduce the likelihood of closures. Two different designs of quota systems are studied within a two-period model: one where the quotas given free of charge are tradable, and one where the quotas are non-tradable. The two quota systems are compared with respect to their ability both to induce the firms to implement investment in abatement technology and to prevent or postpone closures. | nor |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Universitetet i Oslo, CICERO - Senter for klimaforskning | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Working paper / CICERO - Senter for klimaforskning http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-3646 | en_US |
dc.relation.uri | http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-3646 | |
dc.subject | bedriftslevedyktighet | en_US |
dc.subject | internasjonalemiljøproblemer | en_US |
dc.subject | kvoter | en_US |
dc.subject | miljøogteknologi | en_US |
dc.subject | miljøtiltak | en_US |
dc.title | The merits of non-tradable quotas as a domestic policy instrument to prevent firm closure | en_US |
dc.type | Working paper | en_US |
dc.date.updated | 2012-09-14 | en_US |
dc.creator.author | Hagem, Cathrine | en_US |
dc.subject.nsi | VDP::200 | en_US |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:no-4367 | en_US |
dc.type.document | Arbeidsnotat | en_US |
dc.identifier.duo | 7388 | en_US |
dc.identifier.bibsys | 022801782 | en_US |
dc.identifier.fulltext | Fulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/32770/1/1308.pdf | |