Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2013-03-12T12:42:53Z
dc.date.available2013-03-12T12:42:53Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.date.submitted2007-12-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationAlmdahl, Ina Selseth. Radiologisk diagnostikk og behandling av thorakal aortaskade etter stumpt traume. Prosjektoppgave, University of Oslo, 2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/29724
dc.description.abstractInjury of the thoracic aorta after blunt trauma: Radiological evaluation and management Background: Blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury is a life-threatening event. The traditional management of these patients has been immediate open surgical repair, often associated with high perioperative mortality. In recent years endovascular repair has emerged as a less invasive and potentially safer alternative. Methods: The current literature on traumatic thoracic aortic injury was review and a systematic review of publications comparing endovascular and open treatment was undertaken. Relevant articles were searched using Pubmed. In the systematic review papers reporting clinical series with one group of adult patients treated by endovascular repair and another group treated by open repair were identified. Results: 11 publication and 314 patients were included in the systematic review. 123 (39%) were treated by endovascular repair and 191 (61%) underwent open surgical repair. There were no significant differences in demographics, but the mean injury severity score was significantly higher in the endovascular group. 11 patients (9%) in the endovascular group and 32 patients (17%) in the open surgical group died within 30 days of repair. The intraoperative mortality was 0,9% and 9,6% respectively. The differences in mortality reached statistic significance (p<0,05). There were 33 (28%) registered complications during the hospital stay in the endovascular group and 74 (44%) in the open surgical group. Postoperative paraplegia was observed in 12 patients after open surgical repair. There were no cases of paraplegia in the endovascular group. Conclusion: In the reviewed literature, there is a clear trend towards better immediate outcomes after endovascular repair compared with standard open repair for traumatic thoracic aortic injury. However, the long-term results of endovascular repair remain unknown.nor
dc.language.isonoben_US
dc.subjectradiologi
dc.titleRadiologisk diagnostikk og behandling av thorakal aortaskade etter stumpt traumeen_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.date.updated2008-03-13en_US
dc.creator.authorAlmdahl, Ina Selsethen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::763en_US
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&rft.au=Almdahl, Ina Selseth&rft.title=Radiologisk diagnostikk og behandling av thorakal aortaskade etter stumpt traume&rft.inst=University of Oslo&rft.date=2007&rft.degree=Prosjektoppgaveen_US
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-17923en_US
dc.type.documentProsjektoppgaveen_US
dc.identifier.duo68692en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorProfessor Nils-Einar Kløwen_US
dc.identifier.bibsys08040944xen_US
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/29724/3/ProsjektAlmdahl.pdf


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata